Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Evaluation of factors influencing GIFT and comparison of GIFT and IVF results at infertility center of Shariati hospital during 1376-78

Authors
1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics ,Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Medical Biochmistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Today there are a number of methods of Assisted Reproductive Technology. The classic method of IVF has a pregnancy rate of 11-12%. GIFT is a new method with a pregnancy rate of 25–35%. In this study 71 patients were included in GIFT cycle. In our study Pregnancy rate of GIFT was 29.6% whereas in 130 cycles of IVF the pregnancy rate was 14.6%. In this study we found that female age, the number of transfered oocytes, serum estradiol on hCG injection day and sperm characteristics were influential factors affecting the outcome of GIFT.
Keywords

Dlugi AM, Mersol barg Ms, Seibel MM. Gamete intrafallopian transfer.In: Seibel MM, Infertility A Comprehensive Text. Connecticut, Appleton & Lang. 1997,pp: 687.
Corson SL, Batzer F, Eisenberg E, et al: Early experience with the GIFT procedure . J Reprod Med. 1989, 31:219.
Molloy D, Speirs A, Du Plessis Y, Mc Bain J, Johnston. A Laparoscopic approach to a program of gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 1987, 47:289.
Medical Research International, the American Fertility Society Special Interest Group from the National IVF-ET registry. Fertil Steril. 1998, 49:212.
Medical Research International, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), the American Fertility Society: in vitro ertilization–embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United states: 1990 results from the IVF-ET registry. Fertil Steril. 1992, 57:15.
The American Fertility Society, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1991 results from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology generated from the American Fertility Society registry. Fertil Steril. 1993, 59:956.
The American Fertility Society, Society For Assisted Reproductive Technology: Assisted reproductive technology in the United Stated and Canada: 1992 results generated from the American Fertility Society / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 1994, 62:1121.
Mc Gaughey RW, Nemiro JS. Correlation of estrogen levels with oocytes aspirated and with pregnancy in a program of clinical tubal transfer. Fertil Steril. 1987, 48:98.
Imodeme DAG, Wafik AA, Chan ACW. Gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). the Solimon Fakeeh Hospital preliminary experience. Presented at the 5th World Congress on in vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, April 1987, Norfolk, VA.
FIVNAT (French in vitro National): French national registry: Analysis of 1990 data.Fertil Steril. 1993, 59:587.
Nelson JR, Corson SL, Batzer FR, et al. Predicting success of gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril.1993, 60:116.
Guastella G, Comaretto G, Plaermo R, et al. Gamete intrafallopian transfer in the treatment of infertility:The first series at the University of Palermo. Fertil. 1986, 46:417.
Benshushan A,et al. The effect of onadotropin–releasing hormone agonist on embryo quality and pregnancy rate following cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 1993, 59:1065.
Dodson WC, Haney AF. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1991, 55:457.
Franks S, Hamilton-Feirley D. Ovulation Induction. Gonadotropins. In: Adashi EY, Rock JA, Rosenwaks Z,Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery, and Technology. Lippincott-Raven. 1996, pp:1207-25.
Collins JA. Unexplained Infertility. In: Seibel MM, Infertility A Comprehensive text. Connecticut, Appletion & Lange. 1997, pp:331.
Rodriguez–Rigan LJ, Ayala C, Grunert GM,et al. Relationship between the results of sperm analysis and GIFT. J Androl. 1989,10:139.