Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

PCR-Based Evaluation of Tuberculous Endometritis in Infertile Women of North India

Authors
Monika D. Kohli 1
Bimota Nambam 1
Sagar S. Trivedi 2
Banke L. Sherwal 3
Sarika Arora 1
Anju Jain 1
1 Department of Biochemistry, Lady Hardinge Medical College and S.S.K. Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and S.S.K. Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Microbiology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and S.S. K. Hospital, New Delhi, India
Abstract
Background: Tuberculous endometritis is often a diagnostic dilemma for gynecologists in the evaluation of infertility. This study evaluated and compared different diagnostic methods in tuberculous endometritis. Methods: 100 infertile women were investigated for tuberculous endometritis. The endometrial samples obtained by curettage were evaluated by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining of the smears for acid-fast bacilli (AFB), the samples were also cultured on Lowenstein-Jensen medium, and histopathological examination and nested PCR targeting ‘hupB’ gene (Rv 2986c in M. tuberculosis and Mb3010c in M. bovis) which can differentiate between M. tuberculosis and M. bovis were performed. Antibodies against 38-kDa and 16-kDa mycobacterial antigens were detected in serum using ELISA. Statistical analysis was done by online GraphPad Prism software, version 5.0. McNemar’s test was applied and Kappa agreement coefficient was calculated for agreement between various methods. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among the 100 evaluated endometrial samples, one was AFB smear positive, none was positive by culture, four were positive by histopathology and 13 were positive by PCR. Of the 13 PCR-positive cases, 38.4% were positive for M. tuberculosis, 23.07% for M. bovis, and 38.4% showed co-infection with both species. 40% of the patients had raised IgG against M. tuberculosis 38-kDa antigen. McNemar’s test was applied to PCR and the conventional methods of TB diagnosis (AFB, Culture and histopathology) and the p-value was < 0.001 (highly significant) for PCR. Detection by PCR showed a fair agreement with detection by Mantoux test and ELISA. Conclusion: In paucibacillary endometrial tuberculosis, the positive detection rate was found to be significantly higher for PCR compared to other methods. The ‘in-house’ nested PCR assay targeting the hupB gene and used in this study, can serve as a rapid diagnostic aid for tubercular endometritis. It can also differentiate between members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, namely M. tuberculosis and M. bovis.
Keywords
Infertility
M. bovis
M. tuberculosis
PCR
Tuberculous endometritis
  1. Scrimin F, Limone A, Wiesenfeld U, Guaschino S. Tubercular endometritis visualized as endometrial micropolyps during hysteroscopic procedure. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(6):1079-80.
  2. Tripathy SN, Tripathy SN. Gynaecological tuberculosis -an update. Indian J Tuberc. 1998;45:193-7.
  3. Aka N, Vural EZ. Evaluation of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis for genital involvement. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1997;23(4):337-40.
  4. Nagpal M, Pal D. Genital Tuberculosis – A diagnostic dilemma in OPD patients. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2001;51(6):127-31.
  5. Mani R, Nayak S, Kagal A, Deshpande S, Dandge N, Bharadwaj R. Tuberculous endometritis in infertility: A bacteriological and histopathological study. Indian J Tuberc. 2003;50:161.
  6. Singh N, Sumana G, Mittal S. Genital tuberculosis: a leading cause for infertility in women seeking assisted conception in North India. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(4):325-7.
  7. Shah NP, Singhal A, Jain A, Kumar P, Uppal SS, Srivatsava MV, et al. Occurrence of overlooked zoonotic tuberculosis: detection of Mycobacterium bovis in human cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(4):1352-8.
  8. Prasad HK, Singhal A, Mishra A, Shah NP, Katoch VM, Thakral SS, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in India: potential basis for zoonosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2005;85(5-6):421-8.
  9. Grange JM. Mycobacterium bovis infection in human beings. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2001;81(1-2):71-7.
  10. Ananthnarayan R, Paniker CKJ. Mycobacterium-1 Tuberculosis. In: Ananthnarayan R, Paniker CKJ, editors. Textbook of Microbiology. Chennai: Orient Longman; 1996. p. 324-37.
  11. Prabhakar S, Annapurna PS, Jain NK, Dey AB, Tyagi JS, Prasad HK. Identification of an immunegenic histone-like protein (HLPMt) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis. 1998;79(1): 43-53.
  12. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, et al. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998;393(6685):537-44.
  13. Prabhakar S, Mishra A, Singhal A, Katoch VM, Thakral SS, Tyagi JS, et al. Use of the hupB gene encoding a histone-like protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a target for detection and differentiation of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(6):2724-32.
  14. Mishra A, Singhal A, Chauhan DS, Katoch VM, Srivastava K, Thakral SS, et al. Direct detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis in bovine samples by a novel nested PCR assay: correlation with conventional techniques. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11): 5670-8.
  15. Nambam B, Prasad HTK, Sherwal BL, Aneja S, Jain A. Comparative analysis of a hup B gene based diagnostic PCR with other conventional techniques for pediatric tuberculous meningitis. J Pediatr Infect Dis. 2006;1(3):143-8.
  16. Chakravorty S, Tyagi JS. Novel use of guanidinium isothiocyanate in the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from clinical material. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;205(1):113-7.
  17. Srivastava N, Manaktala U, Baveja CP. Role of ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in genital tuberculosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 57(2):205-6.
  18. Biswas D, Agrawal M, Ali A, Bhargava R. Anti ES-31/41 antibodies: A potential tool in the serodiagnosis of extra-pulmonary Tuberculosis. Indian J Tuberc. 2003;50:203-7.
  19. Senol G, Erer OF, Yalcin YA, Coskun M, Gündüz AT, Biçmen C, et al. Humoral immune response against 38-kDa and 16-kDa mycobacterial antigens in tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(1):143-8.
  20. Demkow U, Zielonka TM, Nowak-Misiak M, Filewska M, Bialas B, Strzalkowski J, et al. Humoral immune response against 38-kDa and 16-kDamycobacterial antigens in bone and joint tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6(11):1023-8.
  21. Abebe M, Lakew M, Kidane D, Lakew Z, Kiros K, Harboe M. Female genital tuberculosis in Ethiopia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;84(3):241-6.
  22. Manjunath N, Shankar P, Rajan L, Bhargava A, Saluja S, Shriniwas. Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tubercle. 1991;72(1):21-7.
  23. Vishnevskaia EB, Marttila NJ, Semenovskiĭ AV, Oleĭnik AN, Vil'ianen MK, Vishnevskiĭ. [Polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction in the diagnosis of gynecological tuberculosis]. Probl Tuberk. 2002;(1):49-51. Russian.
  24. Mirlina ED, Lantsov VA, Semenovskiĭ AV, Oleĭnik AN, Popova SS, Manicheva OA, et al.[Diagnostic values of polymerase chain reaction test in females with genital tuberculosis]. Probl Tuberk. 1998;(1):46-8. Russian.
Journal of Reproduction & Infertility
Volume 12, Issue 1
Winter 2011
Pages 9-14