Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Reasons for Elective Cesarean Section amongst Pregnant Women; A Qualitative Study

Authors
1 Student Scientific Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
2 Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Social Security Hospital, Zahedan, Iran
Abstract
Background: A qualitative study was carried out on 200 pregnant women attending obstetric offices and Imam Ali Women's Clinic in Zahedan, Iran during January 2010 to August 2011. Twenty-nine focus group discussions (FGDs) with 5-8 participants in each group were formed. The study included women in the third trimester of pregnancy with the intention or decision to undergo elective cesarean section. The women's views were explored and analyzed in group sessions. Subsequently, the responses were divided into four major categories. The majority (50%) of the opinions expressed were psychological in origin, or stemmed from low perceived behavioral control, improper subjective norms, or wrong attitudes about vaginal delivery. Methods: Twenty-nine focus group discussions (FGDs) with 5-8 participants in each group were formed. The study included women in the third trimester of pregnancy with the intention or decision to undergo elective cesarean section. The women's views were explored and analyzed in group sessions. Results: The responses were divided into four major categories. The majority (50%) of the opinions expressed were psychological in origin, or stemmed from low perceived behavioral control, improper subjective norms, or wrong attitudes about vaginal delivery. Conclusion: It is necessary to hold psychological skills training classes for pregnant women and their husbands to persuade them attend group discussion sessions to increase their control on perceived behavior, highlight their positive attitudes and direct them toward natural vaginal delivery.
Keywords

  1. Jamshidi Manesh M, Oskouie SF, Jouybary L, Sanagoo A. [The process of women’s decision making for selection of cesarean delivery]. Iran J Nurs. 2009;21(56):55-67. Persian.
  2. Sharifi Rad GR, Fathian Z, Tirani M, Mohleki B. [Study on Behavioral Intention Model (BIM) to the attitude of pregnant women toward normal delivery and cesarean section in province of Esfahan -Khomeiny shahr-1385]. J Ilam Univ Med Sci. 2007;15 (1):19-24. Persian.
  3. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL. Williams Obstetrics. Ghazi Jahani B, translator. 2nd ed. Tehran: Golban; 2005. p. 681-5.
  4. Mostafazadeh F, Mashoufi M, Rostamnejad M. [Attitude of pregnant women and health personnel toward normal delivery vs cesarean section]. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2006;6(4):403-8. Persian.
  5. Lashgari MH, Delavari S, Markazi-Moghadam N. [Effects of training programs of pregnant women on their delivery type selection: A single blind, randomized control trail]. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2005;3(4):679-84. Persian.
  6. Karlström A, Rådestad I, Eriksson C, Rubertsson C, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. Cesarean section without medical reason, 1997 to 2006: a Swedish register study. Birth. 2010;37(1):11-20.
  7. Saisto T, Kaaja R, Ylikorkala O, Halmesmäki E. Reduced pain tolerance during and after pregnancy in women suffering from fear of labor. Pain. 2001; 93(2):123-7.
  8. Negahban T, Ansari A. [Does fear of childbirth predict emergency cesarean section in primiparous women?]. Hayat. 2009;14(3-4):73-81. Persian.
  9. Melender HL. Experiences of fears associated with pregnancy and childbirth: a study of 329 pregnant women. Birth. 2002;29(2):101-11.
  10. Johanson RB, El-Timini S, Rigby C, Young P, Jones P. Caesarean section by choice could fulfil the inverse care law. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;97(1):20-2.
  11. Fathian Z, Sharifirad GR, Hasanzadeh A, Fathian Z. [Study of the effects of Behavioral Intention Model education on reducing the cesarean rate among pregnant women of Khomeiny Shahr, Isfahan, 2006]. 2007;9(2):123-31. Persian.
  12. Sharifirad GR, Baghiani Moghadam MH, Fathyian Z, Rezaeian M. The effect of health education using behavior intention model on of cesarean in Khomainy-shahr, Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2009;14(3):105-10.
  13. hdizadeh A, Roosta f, kamali Z, Khoshgoo N. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of antenatal preparation for child birth courses on the health of the mother and the newborn]. Razi J Med Sci. 2003;10 (35):455-62. Persian.
  14. Sharifirad GH, Rezaeian M, Soltani R, Javaheri S, Amidi Mazaheri M. [A survey on the effects of husbands education of pregnant women on knowledge, attitude and reducing elective cesarean section]. Health System Res. 2010;6(1):7-13. Persian.
  15. Kazemzadeh M, Poorolajal J, Ghazanfarzadeh B, Ghahramani M. [Promotion of safe labor through training healthcare workers and pregnant women to reduce cesarean rate in malayer 2004-2005]. J Med Counc Islam Repub Iran. 2007;25(2):149-53. Persian.
  16. Guihard P, Blondel B. Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing the rates in the future. BJOG. 2001;108(1):48-55.