Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Human Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Its Correlation with Conventional Semen Parameters

Authors
Evangelini Evgeni 1
Konstantinos Charalabopoulos 2
Byron Asimakopoulos 2
1 Laboratory of Physiology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Thrace, Greece; Seminology Laboratory, Athens, Greece
2 Laboratory of Physiology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Thrace, Greece
Abstract
Background: The initial step in the diagnostic investigation of male infertility has been traditionally based on the conventional seminal profile. However, there are significant limitations regarding its ability to determine the underlying mechanisms that cause the disorder. Sperm DNA fragmentation has emerged as a potential causative factor of reproductive failure and its assessment has been suggested as a useful adjunct to the laboratory methodology of male infertility evaluation, especially before the application of assisted reproduction technology (ART). Methods: A review of recent bibliography was carried out in PubMed by the use of relevant keywords, in order to evaluate the possible correlation between the conventional seminal parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation assessment as diagnostic tools in male infertility evaluation. Results: A comprehensive diagnostic approach of male infertility should be based on a combination of diagnostic attributes, derived from the conventional semen analysis, as well as the investigation of genomic integrity testing. Conclusion: Due to its strong correlation with several aspects of ART procedures and further consequences for the offspring, sperm DNA fragmentation is a parameter worth integrating in routine clinical practice. However, additional large scale studies focusing on specific subgroups of infertile men who may benefit from an efficient therapeutic management based on the optimization of sperm DNA integrity are needed.
Keywords
Assisted reproduction
Conventional semen parameters
DNA Fragmentation
  1. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR, Nada EA, El-Tonsy MH, Alvarez JG, et al. Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normozoospermic infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(2):313-8.
  2. Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):629-34.
  3. Barratt CL. Semen analysis is the cornerstone of investigation for male infertility. Practitioner. 2007;251(1690):8-10, 12, 15-7.
  4. Patrizio P, Sanguineti F, Sakkas D. Modern andrology: from semen analysis to postgenomic studies of the male gametes. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1127:59-63.
  5. Riddell D, Pacey A, Whittington K. Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3441-5.
  6. Dam AH, Feenstra I, Westphal JR, Ramos L, van Golde RJ, Kremer JA. Globozoospermia revisited. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):63-75.
  7. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. WHO. 2010.
  8. Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS. Sperm DNA damage assessment: a test whose time has come. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(4):850-3.
  9. Spano M, Seli E, Bizzaro D, Manicardi GC, Sakkas D. The significance of sperm nuclear DNA strand breaks on reproductive outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(3):255-60.
  10. Lin MH, Kuo-Kuang Lee R, Li SH, Lu CH, Sun FJ, Hwu YM. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(2):352-9.
  11. Lewis SE, Agbaje I, Alvarez J. Sperm DNA tests as useful adjuncts to semen analysis. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2008;54(3):111-25.
  12. Benchaib M, Lornage J, Mazoyer C, Lejeune H, Salle B, Francois Guerin J. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technologyoutcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):93-100.
  13. Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization?. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):823-31.
  14. Muriel L, Garrido N, Fernández JL, Remohi J, Pellicer A, de los Santos MJ, et al. Value of the sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation level, as measured by the sperm chromatin dispersion test, in the outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):371-83.
  15. Schirren C. Practical Andrology. 1st ed. Berlin: Verlag Bruder Hartman; 1972.
  16. Menkveld R, editor. The basic semen analysis. Oxon: Informa UK Ltd; c2007. 141 p. (Oehninger SC, Kruger TF, editors. Male Infertility. Diagnosis and Treatment; vol. 9).
  17. McDonough R. Editorial comment: has traditional sperm analysis lost its clinical relevance?. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(3):585.
  18. Haidl G, Allam JP, Schuppe HC. Chronic epididymitis: impact on semen parameters and therapeutic options. Andrologia. 2008;40(2):92-6.
  19. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction. 1st ed. Singapore: Press Concern; 1980.
  20. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
  21. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
  22. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  23. Jequier AM. Semen analysis: a new manual and its application to the understanding of semen and its pathology. Asian J Androl. 2010;12(1):11-3.
  24. Handelsman DJ, Cooper TG. Foreword to Semen Analysis in 21st Century Medicine special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology. Asian J Androl. 2010;12(1):7-10.
  25. Aitken RJ. Whither must spermatozoa wander? The future of laboratory seminology. Asian J Androl. 2010;12(1):99-103.
  26. Menkveld R, Wong WY, Lombard CJ, Wetzels AM, Thomas CM, Merkus HM, et al. Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1165-71.
  27. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(3):231-45.
  28. Andrade-Rocha FT. Semen analysis in laboratory practice: an overview of routine tests. J Clin Lab Anal. 2003;17(6):247-58.
  29. Carrell DT, Wilcox AL, Lowy L, Peterson CM, Jones KP, Erickson L, et al. Elevated sperm chromosome aneuploidy and apoptosis in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(6):1229-35.
  30. Ombelet W, Wouters E, Boels L, Cox A, Janssen M, Spiessens C, et al. Sperm morphology assessment: diagnostic potential and comparative analysis of strict or WHO criteria in a fertile and a subfertile population. Int J Androl. 1997;20(6):367-72.
  31. Barratt CL, Mansell S, Beaton C, Tardif S, Oxenham SK. Diagnostic tools in male infertility-the question of sperm dysfunction. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):53-8.
  32. Huszar G, Jakab A, Sakkas D, Ozenci CC, Cayli S, Delpiano E, et al. Fertility testing and ICSI sperm selection by hyaluronic acid binding: clinical and genetic aspects. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(5):650-63.
  33. Bungum M, Bungum L, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA): a tool in diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):69-75.
  34. Fraser L. Structural damage to nuclear DNA in mammalian spermatozoa: its evaluation techniques and relationship withmale infertility. Pol J Vet Sci. 2004;7(4):311-21.
  35. Acharyya S, Kanjilal S, Bhattacharyya AK. Does human sperm nuclear DNA integrity affect embryo quality?. Indian J Exp Biol. 2005;43(11):1016-22.
  36. Ward WS, Coffey DS. DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cells. Biol Reprod. 1991;44(4):569-74.
  37. Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, Manicardi G, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Bianchi U. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod. 1999;4(1):31-7.
  38. Ravel C, Chantot-Bastaraud S, El Houate B, Berthaut I, Verstraete L, De Larouziere V, et al. Mutations in the protamine 1 gene associated with male infertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(7):461-4.
  39. Jenkins TG, Carrell DT. The paternal epigenome and embryogenesis: poising mechanisms for development. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):76-80.
  40. Boissonneault G. Chromatin remodelling during spermiogenesis: a possible role for the transition proteins in DNA strand break repair. FEBS Lett. 2002;514(2-3):111-4.
  41. Yamauchi Y, Shaman JA, Ward WS. Non-genetic contributions of the sperm nucleus to embryonic development. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):31-5.
  42. Leduc F, Nkoma GB, Boissonneault G. Spermiogenesis and DNA repair: a possible etiology of human infertility and genetic disorders. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2008;54(1):3-10.
  43. Alvarez JG. DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa: significance in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Minerva Ginecol. 2003;55(3):233-9.
  44. De Palma A, Vicari E, Palermo I, D'Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of cancer and anti-neoplastic treatment on the human testicular function. J Endocrinol Invest. 2000;23(10):690-6.
  45. French DB, Desai NR, Agarwal A. Varicocele repair: does it still have a role in infertility treatment?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20(3):269-74.
  46. Sergerie M, Mieusset R, Croute F, Daudin M, Bujan L. High risk of temporary alteration of semen parameters after recent acute febrile illness. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(4):970.e1-7.
  47. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Kandirali E, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ, Nada EA, et al. Leukocytospermia is associated with increased reactive oxygen species production by human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(6):1215-24.
  48. Young KE, Robbins WA, Xun L, Elashoff D, Rothmann SA, Perreault SD. Evaluation of chromosome breakage and DNA integrity in sperm: an investigation of remote semen collection conditions. J Androl. 2003;24(6):853-61.
  49. Xia Y, Cheng S, Bian Q, Xu L, Collins MD, Chang HC, et al. Genotoxic effects on spermatozoa of carbaryl-exposed workers. Toxicol Sci. 2005;85(1):615-23.
  50. Rubes J, Selevan SG, Evenson DP, Zudova D, Vozdova M, Zudova Z, et al. Episodic air pollution is associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm without other changes in semen quality. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2776-83.
  51. Rubes J, Selevan SG, Sram RJ, Evenson DP, Perreault SD. GSTM1 genotype influences the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat Res. 2007;625(1-2):20-8.
  52. Wyrobek AJ, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, Tiemann-Boege I, Jabs EW, et al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(25):9601-6.
  53. Cocuzza M, Sikka SC, Athayde KS, Agarwal A. Clinical relevance of oxidative stress and sperm chromatin damage in male infertility: an evidence based analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33(5):603-21.
  54. Ji G, Long Y, Zhou Y, Huang C, Gu A, Wang X. Common variants in mismatch repair genes associated with increased risk of sperm DNA damage and male infertility. BMC Med. 2012;10:49.
  55. Jaiswal D, Sah R, Agrawal NK, Dwivedi US, Trivedi S, Singh K. Combined effect of GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms on human male infertility in north Indian population. Reprod Sci. 2012;19(3):312-6.
  56. Ji G, Gu A, Wang Y, Huang C, Hu F, Zhou Y, et al. Genetic variants in antioxidant genes are associated with sperm DNA damage and risk of male infertility in a Chinese population. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52(4):775-80.
  57. Perrin A, Nguyen MH, Bujan L, Vialard F, Amice V, Gueganic N, et al. DNA fragmentation is higher in spermatozoa with chromosomally unbalanced content in men with a structural chromosomal rearrangement. Andrology. 2013;1(4):632-8.
  58. Rouen A, Pyram K, Pollet-Villard X, Hyon C, Dorna M, Marques S, et al. Simultaneous cell by cell study of both DNA fragmentation and chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa from chromosomal rearrangement carriers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(3):383-90.
  59. Shamsi MB, Kumar R, Malhotra N, Singh N, Mittal S, Upadhyay AD, et al. Chromosomal aberrations, Yq microdeletion, and sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men opting for assisted reproduction. Mol Reprod Dev. 2012; 79(9):637-50.
  60. Aitken RJ, Koppers AJ. Apoptosis and DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):36-42.
  61. Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. J Androl. 2002;23(1):25-43.
  62. Schlegel PN, Paduch DA. Yet another test of sperm chromatin structure. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(4):854-9.
  63. Erenpreiss J, Spano M, Erenpreisa J, Bungum M, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure and male fertility: biological and clinical aspects. Asian J Androl. 2006;8(1):11-29.
  64. Sakkas D, Alvarez JG. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(4):1027-36.
  65. Younglai EV, Holt D, Brown P, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Sperm swim-up techniques and DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(9):1950-3.
  66. Liu CH, Tsao HM, Cheng TC, Wu HM, Huang CC, Chen CI, et al. DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial dysfunction and chromosomal aneuploidy in the spermatozoa of oligoasthenoteratozoospermic males. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(4):119-26.
  67. Milazzo JP, Rives N, Mousset-Simeon N, Mace B. Chromosome constitution and apoptosis of immature germ cells present in sperm of two 47, XYY infertile males. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(7):1749-58.
  68. Mantas D, Angelopoulou R, Msaouel P, Plastira K. Evaluation of sperm chromatin quality and screening of Y chromosome microdeletions in Greek males with severe oligozoospermia. Arch Androl. 2007;53(1):5-8.
  69. Perrin A, Caer E, Oliver-Bonet M, Navarro J, Benet J, Amice V, et al. DNA fragmentation and meiotic segregation in sperm of carriers of a chromosomal structural abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):583-9.
  70. Qiu Y, Wang L, Zhang L, Yang D, Zhang A, Yu J. [Analysis of sperm chromosomal abnormalities and sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile males]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2008;25(6):681-5. Chinese.
  71. Tang SS, Gao H, Zhao Y, Ma S. Aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in morphologically abnormal sperm. Int J Androl. 2010;33(1):e163-79.
  72. Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP. Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):59-68.
  73. Karydis S, Asimakopoulos B, Papadopoulos N, Vakalopoulos I, Al-Hasani S, Nikolettos N. ICSI outcome is not associated with the incidence of spermatozoa with abnormal chromatin condensation. In Vivo. 2005;19(5):921-5.
  74. Sun F, Ko E, Martin RH. Is there a relationship between sperm chromosome abnormalities and sperm morphology?. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:1.
  75. Vicari E, Perdichizzi A, De Palma A, Burrello N, D'Agata R, Calogero AE. Globozoospermia is associated with chromatin structure abnormalities: case report. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(8):2128-33.
  76. Brugnon F, Van Assche E, Verheyen G, Sion B, Boucher D, Pouly JL, et al. Study of two markers of apoptosis and meiotic segregation in ejaculated sperm of chromosomal translocation carrier patients. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):685-93.
  77. Muriel L, Goyanes V, Segrelles E, Gosalvez J, Alvarez JG, Fernandez JL. Increased aneuploidy rate in sperm with fragmented DNA as determined by the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test and FISH analysis. J Androl. 2007;28(1):38-49.
  78. Caglar GS, Koster F, Schopper B, Asimakopoulos B, Nehls B, Nikolettos N, et al. Semen DNA fragmentation index, evaluated with both TUNEL and Comet assay, and the ICSI outcome. In Vivo. 2007;21(6):1075-80.
  79. Garolla A, Fortini D, Menegazzo M, De Toni L, Nicoletti V, Moretti A, et al. High-power microscopy for selecting spermatozoa for ICSI by physiological status. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(5):610-6.
  80. Nikolettos N, Asimakopoulos B, Papastefanou IS. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection—an assisted reproduction technique that should make us cautious about imprinting deregulation. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006;13(5):317-28.
  81. Machev N, Gosset P, Viville S. Chromosome abnormalities in sperm from infertile men with normal somatic karyotypes: teratozoospermia. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111(3-4):352-7.
  82. Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(12):2663-8.
  83. Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D, Flamigni C, Borini A. Clinical relevance of sperm DNA damage in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(6):746-57.
  84. Yagci A, Murk W, Stronk J, Huszar G. Spermatozoa bound to solid state hyaluronic acid show chromatin structure with high DNA chain integrity: an acridine orange fluorescence study. J Androl. 2010;31(6):566-72.
  85. Jakab A, Sakkas D, Delpiano E, Cayli S, Kovanci E, Ward D, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel selection method for sperm with normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(6):1665-73.
  86. Prinosilova P, Kruger T, Sati L, Ozkavukcu S, Vigue L, Kovanci E, et al. Selectivity of hyaluronic acid binding for spermatozoa with normal Tygerberg strict morphology. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(2):177-83.
Journal of Reproduction & Infertility
Volume 15, Issue 1
Winter 2014
Pages 2-14