Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Outpatient Follicle Monitoring: A Plea for Standardization in Ultrasound Based Follicle Monitoring and Data Transfer

Authors
1 IVF Centers Prof Zech, Bregenz, Austria
2 IVF Centers Prof Zech, Salzburg, Austria
Abstract
Background: The complexity of assisted reproductive technology (ART) increased during the last decades. New scientific and medical findings as well as the statutory requirements for improving the safety and the outcome of ART were the main impetus for its development. While therapy planning is done and ART is used by the IVF centers, the medical support and monitoring of patients is conducted by referring gynecologists. Reported follicle measurements by the gynecologist allow the adoption of the therapy plan. Most notably, the crucial aspect is processing and interpretation of ultrasound scan (US). The results of the received US, the transfer of data between IVF center(s) and referred physician(s) as well as the subjective interpretation often culminate in interpretation and logistical problems. This might increase the error probability with considerable detriments for the patients and ART outcome. Methods: The follicle monitoring was performed using Voluson I ultrasound system combined with SonoAVC® software. Results were communicated via DICOM language to DynaMed® software, a medical program for managing an IVF center with seamless integration of all processes needed for an accurate and precise workflow. Results: In this study, no loss of data was detected. All data were integrated by DynaMed® software and were recallable in a fast and easy manner. Conclusion: The broad usage of Voluson I ultrasound SonoAVC® software and communication of the results via Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) server between the IVF center and local gynecologist would provide more assistance for the patients and consequently the ART outcomes can be improved.
Keywords

  1. Forman RG, Robinson J, Yudkin P, Egan D, Reynolds K, Barlow DH. What is the true follicular diameter: an assessment of the reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(5):989-92.
  2. Deutch TD, Joergner I, Matson DO, Oehninger S, Bocca S, Hoenigmann D, et al. Automated assessment of ovarian follicles using a novel three-dimensional ultrasound software. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1562-8.
  3. Murtinger M, Aburumieh A, Rubner P, Eichel V, Zech MH, Zech NH. Improved monitoring of ovarian stimulation using 3D transvaginal ultrasound plus automated volume count. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(5):695-9.
  4. Wittmaack FM, Kreger DO, Blasco L, Tureck RW, Mastroianni L Jr, Lessey BA. Effect of follicular size on oocyte retrieval, fertilization, cleavage, and embryo quality in in vitro fertilization cycles: a 6-year data collection. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(6):1205-10.
  5. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2(8085):366.
  6. Olofsson JI, Banker MR, Sjoblom LP. Quality management systems for your in vitro fertilization clinic's laboratory: Why bother? J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6(1):3-8.
  7. European commission. Commission directive 2003/94/EC of 8 October 2003 laying down the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice in respect of medicinal products for human use and investigational medicinal products for human use (2004/23/EC) [Internet]. Brussels (Belgium): Official Journal of the European Union; 2003 Oct 8 [cited 2013 Feb 12]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol1/dir_2003_94/dir_2003_94_en.pdf
  8. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Clewes J, Joergner I, Dehghani Bonaki S, et al. Automated follicle tracking improves measurement reliability in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(5):658-63.
  9. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Clewes J. Automated follicle tracking facilitates standardization and may improve work flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(7):1015-8.
  10. Ata B, Seyhan A, Reinblatt SL, Shalom-Paz E, Krishnamurthy S, Tan SL. Comparison of automated and manual follicle monitoring in an unrestricted population of 100 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):127-33.
  11. Hains IM, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI. The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(4):506-13.
  12. Alper MM; International Standards Organization. Experience with ISO quality control in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1503-8.