Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

A Novel de novo Balanced Reciprocal Translocation t(18;22) Associated with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case Report

Authors
Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Tuljaguda complex, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
Background: Recurrent miscarriage is a major concern in the couples with reproductive problems. The chromosomal abnormalities, mainly balanced rearrangements are reported in variable phenotypes and the prevalence of them is 2-8% in such couples. Case Presentation: In this study, the clinical, cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic evaluations were performed on a couple with RM. The cytogenetic analysis of the husband revealed a balanced reciprocal translocation of t(18;22)(q21.1;q12) whereas wife had a normal karyotype of 46,XX. Further spectral karyotyping was performed to rule out the involvement of any other chromosomal aberrations present in the genome. Additional whole chromosome paint FISH (Fluorescence in situ hybridization) with paint probes 18 and 22 confirmed the translocation. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first report of a novel (18;22) translocation with unique breakpoints and their association with RM. The reciprocal translocations provide a good opportunity for the identification of disease associated genes. However, in recurrent miscarriages, most of them do not disrupt any gene at the breakpoint but can lead to unbalanced gametes and hence poor reproductive outcome like RM or birth of a child with malformations and intellectual disability. The translocation breakpoints might be risk factors for RM. Moreover, the impact of the balanced translocations in association with RM is discussed in this report.
Keywords

  1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG). The management of recurrent miscarriage. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1998.
  2. Sierra S, Stephenson M. Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2006;24(1):17-24.
  3. Jacobs PA, Browne C, Gregson N, Joyce C, White H. Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding. J Med Genet. 1992; 29(2):103-8.
  4. Fryns JP, Van Buggenhout G. Structural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81(2):171-6.
  5. Elghezal H, Hidar S, Mougou S, Khairi H, Saad A. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):721-3.
  6. Chaitra PT, Malini SS, Sharat kumar C. An overview of genetic and molecular factors responsible for recurrent preganancy loss. Int J Hum Genet. 2011;11:217-25.
  7. Rao L, Murthy K, Babu A, Venkata P, Deenadayal M, Singh L. Chromosome inversions and a novel chromosome insertion associated with recurrent miscarriages in South India. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(4):273-7.
  8. Lin P, Jetly R, Lennon PA, Abruzzo LV, Prajapati S, Medeiros LJ. Translocation (18;22)(q21;q11) in B-cell lymphoma: a report of 4 cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(11):1664-72.
  9. Seite P, Leroux D, Hillion J, Monteil M, Berger R, Mathieu-Mahul D, et al. Molecular analysis of a variant 18;22 translocation in a case of lymphocytic lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1993;6(1):39-44.
  10. Shaffer LG, McGowan-Jordan J, Schmid M. An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland: Karger publications; 2013.
  11. Hook EB, Hamerton JL. The frequency of chromosome abnormalities detected in consecutive newborn studies- differences between studies- results by sex and by severity of phenotypic involvement. Population Cytogenetic. New York: Academic Press; 1977. 66 p.
  12. Mackie Ogilvie C, Scriven PN. Meiotic outcomes in reciprocal translocation carriers ascertained in 3-day human embryos. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10(12):801-6.
  13. Dutta UR, Rajitha P, Pidugu VK, Dalal AB. Cytogenetic abnormalities in 1162 couples with recurrent miscarriages in Southern region of India: report and review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(2):145-9.
  14. Bhasin MK, Foerster W, Fuhrmann W. A cytogenetic study of recurrent abortion. Humangenetik. 1973;18(2):139-48.
  15. Mozdarani H, Meybodi AM, Zari-Moradi S. A cytogenetic study of couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions and infertile patients with recurrent IVF/ICSI failure. Indian J Hum Genet. 2008;14(1):1-6.
  16. Ananthapur V, Awari S, Veena K, Sujatha M, Jyothy A. Non-Robertsonian translocation t (2;11) is associated with infertility in an oligospermic man. Andrologia. 2014;46(4):453-5.
  17. Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie CM. Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenata Diagn. 1998;18(13):1437-49.