Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Laparoscopic Fimbrioplasty and Neosalpingostomy in Female Infertility: A Review of 402 Cases at the Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital in Yaoundé-Cameroon

Authors
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon; Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
3 Laboratory of Clinical Biology, Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon
4 Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon
5 Anesthesia Unit, Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon
Abstract
Background: More than 70 million couples suffer from infertility worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fertility outcomes after laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and neosalpingostomy in female infertility. Methods: Laparoscopic distal tuboplasty was carried out for 402 cases at the Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital in Yaoundé-Cameroon in Central Africa from December 2002 to December 2007. Laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and neosalpingostomy were done using bipolar electrocoagulation and conventional endoscopic instruments. Log-rank test was used to compare cumulative rate curves of intrauterine pregnancy with respect to the tubal stages. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the patients was 31.6±5.45 years. Secondary infertility was the most frequent type of infertility (70.14%). The laparoscopic tubal surgery done consisted of fimbrioplasty in 185(46%) cases and neosalpingostomy in 217(54%) cases. Of 260 women followed up after tuboplasty, there were overall 74(28.48%) pregnancies; 68(26.1%) intrauterine pregnancies and 6(2.3%) ectopic pregnancies. Pregnancy rates were significantly associated to the tubal stage (63% in stage 1, 15% in stage 3 and 00% in stage 4; p<0.001) and the adnexal adhesion scores (73.91% in the absence of adnexal adhesions and 8.8% in the case of a severe adnexal adhesion score). Of the 68 intrauterine pregnancies, there were 60(88%) live births and 8(12%) spontaneous abortions. Conclusion: It is believed that laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and neosalpingostomy should be the preferred choice when faced with tubal distal occlusion in a context of female infertility. This implies that training in endoscopic surgery should be regarded as an important issue in developing countries.
Keywords

  1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683-7.
  2. Leke RJ, Oduma JA, Bassol-Mayagoitia S, Bacha AM, Grigor KM. Regional and geographical variations in infertility: effects of environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic factors. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101 Suppl 2:73-80.
  3. Bergstrom S. Reproductive failure as a health priority in the Third World: a review. East Afr Med J. 1992;69(4):174-80.
  4. Daar AS, Merali Z. Infertility and social suffering: the case of ART in developing countries. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD, editors. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002. 396 p.
  5. Dyer SJ, Abrahams N, Hoffman M, van der Spuy ZM. 'Men leave me as I cannot have children': women's experiences with involuntary childlessness. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1663-8.
  6. Umezulike AC, Efetie ER. The psychological trauma of infertility in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;84(2):178-80.
  7. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506-12.
  8. Steinkeler JA, Woodfield CA, Lazarus E, Hillstrom MM. Female infertility: a systematic approach to radiologic imaging and diagnosis. Radiographics. 2009;29(5):1353-70.
  9. Donnez J, Casanas-Roux F. Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery. Fertil Steril. 1986;46(2):200-4.
  10. Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):605-21.
  11. Fathalla MF, Sinding SW, Rosenfield A, Fathalla MM. Sexual and reproductive health for all: a call for action. Lancet. 2006;368(9552):2095-100.
  12. Okonofua FE, Essen UI, Nimalaraj T. Hysterosalpingography versus laparoscopy in tubal infertility: comparison based on findings at laparatomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989;28(2):143-7.
  13. Sharma S, Mittal S, Aggarwal P. Management of infertility in low resource countries. BJOG. 2009;116 Suppl 1:77-83.
  14. Kasia JM, Raiga J, Doh AS, Biouele JM, Pouly JL, Kwiatkowski F, et al. Laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and neosalpingostomy. Experience of the Yaounde General Hospital, Cameroon (report of 194 cases). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;73(1):71-7.
  15. American Fertility Society. Classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusions secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian abnormalities and intra uterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944-55.
  16. Mage G, Pouly JL, de Joliniere JB, Chabrand S, Riouallon A, Bruhat MA. A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery. Fertil Steril. 1986;46(5):807-10.
  17. De Cherney AH. Tubal disease: surgery and in vitro fertilization. In: Kase NG, Weingold AB, Gershenson DM, editors. Principles and Practice of Clinical Gynecology. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 1990. p. 445-57.
  18. El-Mowafi DM, Ngoh NN. Management of tubal obstructions. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:199-212.
  19. Berker B, Mahdavi A, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat C. Role of laparoscopic surgery in infertility. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2005;10(2):94-104.
  20. Bruhat MA, Mage G, Pouly JL, Manhes H, Canis M, Wattiez A. [Adhesions in operatory laparoscopy]. Paris: Medsi/McGraw-Hill; 1989. 215 p. French.
  21. Madelenat P, Filoux Y, Hazout A, Palmer R. [Laparoscopic treatment of stenoses and phimosis of the ampulla of the tube. A critical study of the results (author's transl)]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1979;8(5):445-50. French.
  22. Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Manhes H, Wattiez A, Bruhat MA. Laparoscopic distal tuboplasty: report of 87 cases and a 4-year experience. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(4):616-21.
  23. Dubuisson JB, Bouquet de Joliniere J, Aubriot FX, Darai E, Foulot H, Mandelbrot L. Terminal tuboplasties by laparoscopy: 65 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(3):401-3.
  24. Larue L, Sedbon E, Crequat J, Madelenat P. [Per-celioscopic surgery of the distal fallopian tube in infertility]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19(3):343-7. French.
  25. Ahmad G, Watson AJ, Metwally M. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2007;10(1):43-7.
  26. Dlugi AM, Reddy S, Saleh WA, Mersol-Barg MS, Jacobsen G. Pregnancy rates after operative endoscopic treatment of total (neosalpingostomy) or near total (salpingostomy) distal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(5):913-20.
  27. Eyraud B, Erny R, Vergnet F. [Distal tubal surgery using laparoscopy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1993;22(1):9-14. French.
  28. Audebert AJ, Pouly JL, Von Theobald P. Laparoscopic fimbrioplasty: an evaluation of 35 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1496-9.
  29. Nordenskjold F, Ahlgren M. Risk factors in ectopic pregnancy. Results of a population-based case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70(7-8):575-9.
  30. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly JL, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(3):185-94.
  31. Gomel V. Salpingo-ovariolysis by laparoscopy in infertility. Fertil Steril. 1983;40(5):607-11.
  32. Strandell A, Bryman I, Janson PO, Thorburn J. Background factors and scoring systems in relation to pregnancy outcome after fertility surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74(4):281-7.
  33. Nachtigall RD. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):871-5.