Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Can a Short Term of Repeated Ejaculations Affect Seminal Parameters?

Authors
1 Reproduction Group, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Medical School, University of Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia
2 Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
3 Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Life Science and Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, India
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of four repeated ejaculations on the same day at two-hour intervals on conventional and functional semen parameters. Methods: Three healthy men (32±3.6 years) donated the first semen samples after 3-4 days of sexual abstinence followed by three subsequent samples on the same day at two-hour interval each. Semen samples were processed and analyzed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 guidelines. Furthermore, intracellular reactive oxygen (ROS) production, sperm DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial function were evaluated by flow cytometry. Results: An overall decreasing trend was noted in the conventional semen parameters at second, third and fourth evaluations after two hours of abstinence in comparison to first evaluation after 3-4 days of abstinence. The statistical comparison of the conventional semen parameters at fourth evaluation after 2 hr of abstinence revealed significant reduction (p<0.05) in the parameters of concentration, total sperm count and total motile sperm count at fourth evaluation. The functional parameter of intracellular ROS production showed a decreasing trend with each subsequent evaluation, the difference being significant (p<0.05) at fourth evaluation in comparison to first evaluation. An increasing trend was noted for DNA fragmentation index (DFI), although it remained within acceptable levels (<29%). The ∆Ψm high spermatozoa and the integrity of the plasma membrane remained stable throughout the evaluations. Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate the potential use of additional semen samples with repeated ejaculations at short abstinence times in assisted reproduction procedures particularly from severe oligospermic men.
Keywords

  1. Amann RP. Considerations in evaluating human spermatogenesis on the basis of total sperm per ejaculate. J Androl. 2009;30(6):626-41.
  2. Gomendio M, Roldan ER. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc Biol Sci. 1991;243(1308):181-5.
  3. delBarco-Trillo J, Tourmente M, Roldan ER. Metabolic rate limits the effect of sperm competition on mammalian spermatogenesis. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e76510.
  4. Joseph PN, Sharma RK, Agarwal A, Sirot LK. Men ejaculate larger volumes of semen, more motile sperm, and more quickly when exposed to images of novel women. Evol Psychol Sci. 2015;1(4):195-200.
  5. Johnson L, Varner DD. Effect of daily spermatozoan production but not age on transit time of spermatozoa through the human epididymis. Biol Reprod. 1988;39(4):812-7.
  6. Amann RP. A critical review of methods for evaluation of spermatogenesis from seminal characteristics. J Androl. 1981;2(1):37-58.
  7. Turner TT. De Graaf's thread: the human epididymis. J Androl. 2008;29(3):237-50.
  8. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010. 286 p.
  9. Andersen AG, Jensen TK, Carlsen E, Jorgensen N, Andersson AM, Krarup T, et al. High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(2):366-72.
  10. Handelsman DJ, Conway AJ, Boylan LM, Turtle JR. Testicular function in potential sperm donors: normal ranges and the effects of smoking and varicocele. Int J Androl. 1984;7(5):369-82.
  11. MacLeod J, Wang Y. Male fertility potential in terms of semen quality: a review of the past, a study of the present. Fertil Steril. 1979;31(2):103-16.
  12. De Jonge C, LaFromboise M, Bosmans E, Ombelet W, Cox A, Nijs M. Influence of the abstinence period on human sperm quality. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(1):57-65.
  13. Magnus O, Tollefsrud A, Abyholm T, Purvis K. Effects of varying the abstinence period in the same individuals on sperm quality. Arch Androl. 1991;26(3):199-203.
  14. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B. Effect of long abstinence periods on human sperm quality. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1994;39(5):278-82.
  15. Nnatu SN, Giwa-Osagie OF, Essien EE. Effect of repeated semen ejaculation on sperm quality. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1991;18(1):39-42.
  16. Mayorga-Torres BJ, Camargo M, Agarwal A, du Plessis SS, Cadavid AP, Cardona Maya WD. Influence of ejaculation frequency on seminal parameters. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:47.
  17. Sanchez-Martin P, Sanchez-Martin F, Gonzalez-Martinez M, Gosalvez J. Increased pregnancy after reduced male abstinence. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2013;59(5):256-60.
  18. Marshburn PB, Giddings A, Causby S, Matthews ML, Usadi RS, Steuerwald N, et al. Influence of ejaculatory abstinence on seminal total antioxidant capacity and sperm membrane lipid peroxidation. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):705-10.
  19. Kucuk T, Sozen E, Buluc B. Intrauterine insemination with double ejaculate compared with single ejaculate in male factor infertility: a pilot study. J Androl. 2008;29(4):404-7.
  20. Marshburn PB, Alanis M, Matthews ML, Usadi R, Papadakis MH, Kullstam S, et al. A short period of ejaculatory abstinence before intrauterine insemination is associated with higher pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(1):286-8.
  21. Gosalvez J, Gonzalez-Martinez M, Lopez-Fernandez C, Fernandez JL, Sanchez-Martin P. Shorter abstinence decreases sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in ejaculate. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1083-6.
  22. Bar-Hava I, Perri T, Ashkenazi J, Shelef M, Ben-Rafael Z, Orvieto R. The rationale for requesting a second consecutive sperm ejaculate for assisted reproductive technology. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2000;14(6):433-6.
  23. Cardona Maya WD, Berdugo Gutierrez JA, de los Rios J, Cadavid Jaramillo AP. Functional evaluation of sperm in Colombian fertile men. Arch Esp Urol. 2007;60(7):827-31.
  24. Mayorga-Torres BJ, Cardona-Maya W, Cadavid A, Camargo M. [Evaluation of sperm functional parameters in normozoospermic infertile individuals]. Actas Urol Esp. 2013;37(4):221-7. Spanish.
  25. Cardona-Maya W, Berdugo J, Cadavid A. [Comparing the sperm concentration determined by the Makler and the Neubauer chambers]. Actas Urol Esp. 2008;32(4):443-5. Spanish.
  26. Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®). Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:147-64.
  27. Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(4):1039-49.
  28. Gil-Villa AM, Cardona-Maya W, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Cadavid A. Role of male factor in early recurrent embryo loss: do antioxidants have any effect? Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):565-71.
  29. Gil-Villa AM, Cardona-Maya W, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Cadavid A. Assessment of sperm factors possibly involved in early recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1465-72.
  30. Rodriguez E, Gil-Villa AM, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Cardona-Maya W, Cadavid AP. [Evaluation of atypical semen parameters in individuals whose couples had a history of early recurrent embryo death: in search for a reference value]. Biomedica. 2011;31(1):100-7. Spanish.
  31. Zverina J, Pondelickova J. Changes in seminal parameters of ejaculates after repeated ejaculation. Andrologia. 1988;20(1):52-4.
  32. Gulmez I, Tatlisen A, Karacagil M, Kesekci S. Seminal parameters of ejaculates collected successively with sixty minute interval in infertile men: effect of combination of prazosin and terbutaline on these parameters. Andrologia. 1991;23(2):167-9.
  33. Check JH, Chase JS. Improved semen quality after a short-interval second ejaculation. Fertil Steril. 1985;44(3):416-8.
  34. Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of sperm cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential related to cell motility. J Histochem Cytochem. 1982;30(3):279-80.
  35. Garner DL, Thomas CA, Joerg HW, DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE. Fluorometric assessments of mitochondrial function and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1997;57(6):1401-6.
  36. Chen LB. Mitochondrial membrane potential in living cells. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:155-81.
  37. Frank SA, Hurst LD. Mitochondria and male disease. Nature. 1996;383(6597):224.
  38. Ollero M, Muino-Blanco T, Lopez-Perez MJ, Cebrian-Perez JA. Viability of ram spermatozoa in relation to the abstinence period and successive ejaculations. Int J Androl. 1996;19(5):287-92.