Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

The First ongoing Pregnancy Following Comprehensive Aneuploidy Assessment Using a Combined Blastocenetesis, Cell Free DNA and Trophectoderm Biopsy Strategy

Authors
Jara Ben-Nagi 1
Rabi Odia 2
Xavier Gonzalez 2
Carleen Heath 2
Dhruti Babariya 3
Sioban SenGupta 4
Paul Serhal 1
Dagan Wells 5
1 Clinical Department, The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
2 Embryology Department, The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
3 Cooper Genomics, London, UK
4 Institute of Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
5 Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, London, UK
Abstract
Background: The exact origin of cell-free DNA found in spent culture media or blastocoel fluid is currently unknown but with the potential to become an improved source of DNA for chromosomal analysis than trophectoderm biopsy samples, it provides a superior representation of the fetal genetic status. However, the genetic material contained within the blastocoel cavity may be more reliable to assessment of embryo euploidy in a clinical context than trophectoderm of cell-free DNA. Case Presentation: This is the first UK case report where all three sources of DNA were analyzed in a clinical setting on 29 th January 2018 at the Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, leading to an ongoing clinical pregnancy. Conclusion: The experience from this case report suggests that removal of blasto-coel fluid, sampling of spent culture media and trophectoderm biopsy can be carried out in parallel. Gathering genetic information from two to three independent samples of embryo DNA may provide enhanced diagnostic accuracy and may clarify cytogenetic status of mosaic embryos.
Keywords
biopsy
Blastocentesis
Cell free DNA
Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012;5(1):24.
Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embry-onic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):624-30.
Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):100-7.e1.
Chen M, Wei S, Hu J, Quan S. Can comprehensive chromosome screening technology improve IVF/ ICSI outcomes? a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140779.
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 104(6):1503-12.
Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F. Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):454-66.
Gleicher N, Orvieto R. Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? a review. J Ovarian Res. 2017;10(1):21.
Fragouli E, Wells D. Current status and future prospects of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneu-ploidy. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):408-9.
Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Stoppa M, Romano S, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, et al. No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(1):57-66.
Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2245-54.
Palini S, Galluzzi L, De Stefani S, Bianchi M, Wells D, Magnani M, et al. Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(6):603-10.
Magli MC, Pomante A, Cafueri G, Valerio M, Crip-pa A, Ferraretti AP, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic fluid? Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):676-83.e5.
Stigliani S, Anserini P, Venturini PL, Scaruffi P. Mitochondrial DNA content in embryo culture medium is signifi-cantly associated with human em-bryo fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(10):2652-60.
Wu H, Ding C, Shen X, Wang J, Li R, Cai B, et al. Medium-based noninvasive preimplantation genetic diagnosis for human alpha-thalassemias-SEA. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(12):e669.
Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Pomante A, Crivello AM, Cafueri G, Valerio M, et al. Blastocentesis: a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1692-9.e6.
Tobler KJ, Zhao Y, Ross R, Benner AT, Xu X, Du L, et al. Blastocoel fluid from differentiated blastocysts harbors embryonic genomic material capable of a whole-genome deoxyribonucleic acid amplification and comprehensive chromosome microarray analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):418-25.
Xu J, Fang R, Chen L, Chen D, Xiao JP, Yang W, et al. Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(42):11907-12.
Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Antes R, Abramov R, Motamedi G, Ibarrientos Z, et al. Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic scre-ening approach. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197262.
Vera-Rodriguez M, Diez-Juan A, Jimenez-Alma-zan J, Martinez S, Navarro R, Peinado V, et al. Origin and composition of cell-free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development. Hum Reprod. 2018;33 (4):745-56.
Gosden R. Cryopreservation: a cold look at techno-logy for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2011;96 (2):264-8.
Zhang Y, Li N, Wang L, Sun H, Ma M, Wang H, et al. Molecular analysis of DNA in blastocoele fluid using next-generation sequencing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(5):637-45.
Journal of Reproduction & Infertility
Volume 20, Issue 1
Winter 2019
Pages 57-62