Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Determining the Cause of Recurrent Miscarriages in a Couple: Importance of NOR in the Era of NGS

Authors
1 Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Tuljaguda complex, Hyderabad, India
2 Department of Medical Genetics, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India; Diagnostics Division, Center for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Tuljaguda complex, Hyderabad, India
Abstract
Background: Chromosomal abnormalities are a significant cause of human disorders. The characterization of such abnormalities helps in the identification of known/new genes. The purpose of the present study was to identify the cause of miscarriages in a couple by using combined molecular and cytogenetic techniques. Case Presentation: In this study, the clinical, cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic evaluations were performed on a couple with recurrent miscarriages. Several methods like GTG banding, silver nitrate (NOR) staining, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using whole chromosome paint probes (WCP) and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones were used. The chromosomal analysis on the metaphases revealed a karyotype of 46,XX in the wife and 46,XY,13p+ in her husband. To check the satellites on 13p region, NOR was performed which showed absence of satellites and presence of euchromatic material. On careful analysis, the satellites were observed on 11q terminal region. Thus, a balanced reciprocal translocation was detected which was confirmed by WCP and Acro-P-arm FISH. Fine mapping with BAC clones narrowed down the breakpoint regions. Conclusion: The application of the combined cytogenetic methods especially NOR helped in identification of the balanced reciprocal translocation with subsequent systematic characterization and the breakpoint regions were identified. The characterization of the breakpoint regions helped in identification of the carrier status which further paved the way for understanding the cause of recurrent miscarriages and proper genetic counseling.
Keywords

  1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG). The management of recurrent miscarriage. (Edition???). London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1998. (Pagination??).
  2. De Braekeleer M, Dao TN. Cytogenetic studies in couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses. Hum Reprod. 1990;59(5):519-28.
  3. Rutkowski S, Stene J, Gallano P. Risk estimates in balanced parental reciprocal translocations: analysis of 1120 pedigrees. 1st ed. Paris: Expansion Scien-tifique Francaise; 1988. 147 p.
  4. Daniel A, Hook EB, Wulf G. Risk of unbalanced progeny at amniocentesis to carriers of chromosome rearrange-ments: data from United States and Canadian laboratories. Am J Med Genet. 1989;33(1):14-53.
  5. Smeets D, van Ravenswaaij C, de Pater J, Gerssen-Schoorl K, Van Hemel J, Janssen G, et al. At least nine cases of trisomy 11 q23- qter in one generation as a result of familial t( 11;13) translocation. J Med Genet. 1997;34(1):18-23.
  6. Dutta UR, Ponnala R, Pidugu VK, Dalal AB. Cytogenetic abnormalities in 1162 couples with recurrent miscarriages in southern region of India: report and review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(2):145-9.
  7. Mitelman F, Johansson B, Mertens FE. Mitelman database of chromosome aberrations in cancer. Available at: http://www.cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman. Accessed August 12, 2003.
  8. Huret JL, Dessen P, Bernheim A. Atlas of genetics and cytogenetics in oncology and haematology, year 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(1):272-4.
  9. Francke U, Weber F, Sparkes RS, Mattson PD, Mann J. Duplication 11(q21 to 23 leads to qter) syn-drome. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(3B):167-86.
  10. Bader PJ, Jansch M, Hoffman D, Palmer CG, Gerber H, Taylor G. Trisomy 11q(q21 leads to qter). Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14(6C):383-92.
  11. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence data-base of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35 (Database issue):D61-5.
  12. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Prin-gle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996-1006.
  13. Langer PR, Waldrop AA, Ward DC. Enzymatic synthesis of biotin-labeled polynucleotides: novel nucleic acid affinity probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78(11):6633-7.
  14. Hook EB, editor. Population Cytogenetics: Studies in Humans. 1st ed. The frequency of chromosome abnormalities detected in consecutive newborn studies-differences between studies- results by sex and by severity of phenotypic involvement. New York: Academic Press; 1977. 374 p.
  15. Rooryck C, VuPhi Y, Sonakri N, Burgelin I, Saura R, Lacombe D, et al. Characterization of a de novo balanced translocation t (9;18)(p23;q12.2) in a patient with oculoauriculovertebral spectrum. Eur J Med Genet. 2010;53(2):104-7.
  16. Bhasin MK, Foerster W, Fuhrmann W. A cytogenetic study of recurrent abortion. Humangenetik. 1973;18(2):139-48.
  17. Sierra S, Stephenson M. Genetics of recurrent preg-nancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2006;24(1):17-24.