Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Can We Prepare IVF Culture Media Two Days Before Ovum Pick up Without Affecting Embryological Parameters? A Retrospective Case-Matched Study

Authors
1 ASST Lariana, Infertility Unit, Cantù, Italy
2 Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Abstract
Background: According to several laboratory protocols and specific conditions, in vitro fertilization (IVF) dishes with culture media can be prepared 24 hr in advance compared to routine protocols. However, it is not clear if this procedure can affect embryological outcomes. Methods: A nested case-control study was done in a cohort of couples undergoing IVF at the Infertility Unit of the ASST Lariana from August 2016 to July 2018. Cases were patients undergoing ovum pick up after a laboratory day off. Controls were patients undergoing ovum pick up after working days from Monday to Thursday. Culture media for oocyte culture and insemination were prepared about 42 and 18 hr before oocyte retrieval for cases and controls, respectively. Cases and controls were matched with a 1:2 ratio (for age, inseminated oocytes, length of stimulation). The "Good-Quality-Index" (GQI) was the main outcome to be compared between the two groups and was defined as good quality transferred or cryopreserved embryos on day 2 or 3+number of good quality blastocysts/inseminated oocytes. Results: A total of 76 cases and 152 matched controls were enrolled. The median GQI was equal to 33.0% (IQR: 20.0-50.0%) and 33.0% (IQR: 25.0-50.0%), in cases and controls, respectively (p=0.40). Study groups and GQI were not significantly correlated (correlation coefficient r=0.047, p=0.48). Main embryological parameters and cumulative pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Our data support the vision that culture media can be prepared 24 hr in advance compared to routine protocols without affecting embryological outcomes.
Keywords

  1. Zorn JR, Boyer P, Guichard A. Never on asunday: programming for IVF-ETand gift. Lancet. 1987;(8529):385-6.
  2. Conaghan J, Dimitry ES, Mills M, Margara RA, Winston RM. Delayed human chorionic gonadotropin administration for in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 1989;(8650):1323-4.
  3. Dimitry ES, Bates SA, Oskarsson T, Margara R, Winston RM. Programming in vitro fertilization for a 5- or 3-day week. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(5):934-8.
  4. Abdalla H, Baber RJ, Leonard T, Kirkland A, Mitchell A, Power M,et al. Timed oocyte collection in an assisted conception programme using GnRH analogue. Hum Reprod. 1989;4(8):927-30.
  5. Tan SL, Balen A, Hussein EE, el Hussein E, Mills C, Campbell S, et al. A prospective randomized study of the optimum timing of human chorionic gonadotropin administration after pituitary desensitization in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(6):1259-64.
  6. Mochtar MH, Custers IM, Koks CA, Bernardus RE, Verhoeve HR, Mol BW,et al. Timing oocyte collection in GnRH agonists down-regulated IVF and ICSI cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(5):1091-6.
  7. Kolibianakis EM, Albano C, Camus M, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Prolongation of the follicular phase in in vitro fertilization results in a lower ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(1):102-7.
  8. Feichtinger M, Karlström PO, Olofsson JI, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Weekend-free scheduled IVF/ICSI procedures and single embryo transfer do not reduce live-birth rates in a general infertile population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(12):1423-9.
  9. Tremellen KP, Lane M. Avoidance of weekend oocyte retrievals during GnRH antagonist treatment by simple advancement or delay of hCG administration does not adversely affect IVF live birth outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(5):1219-24.
  10. Morley L, Tang T, Yasmin E, Hamzeh R, Rutherford AJ, Balen AH. Timing of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone administration in IVF protocols using GnRH antagonists: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Fertil. 2012;15(3):134-9.
  11. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM,Alvarez Sedo CR,Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD002118.
  12. Brown J, Daya S, Matson P. Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD004378.
  13. Costa-Borges N, Bellés M, Meseguer M, Galliano D, Ballesteros A, Calderón G. Blastocyst development in single medium with or without renewal on day 3: a prospective cohort study on sibling donor oocytes in a time-lapse incubator. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):707-13.
  14. Aparicio-Ruiz B, Romany L, Meseguer M. Selection of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse microscopy in in vitro fertilization: state of the technology and future directions. Birth Defects Res. 2018;110(8):648-53.
  15. Reed ML, Hamic A, Thompson DJ, Caperton CL. Continuous uninterrupted single medium culture without medium renewal versus sequential media culture: a sibling embryo study. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1783-6.
  16. Wiemer KE. Setup procedures for optimizing performance in the IVF laboratory.In: Montag MH, Morbeck DE, editors. Principles of IVF laboratory practice. Cambridge university press: New York; 2017. p. 88-96.
  17. Swain J, Cabrera L, Xu X, Smith GD. Microdrop preparation factors influence culture-media osmolality, which can impair mouse embryo preimplantation development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(2):142-7.
  18. Kleijkers SH, van Montfoort AP, Bekers O, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Evers JL, et al. Ammonium accumulation in commercially available embryo culture media and protein supplements during storage at 2-8°C and during incubation at 37°C. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(6):1192-9.
  19. Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67(1):73-80.
  20. Alpha scientists in reproductive medicine and ESHRE special interest group of embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270-83.
  21. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: the European IVF-monitoring consortium (EIM) for the European society of human reproduction and embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1586-1601.
  22. Stewart-Savage J, Bavister BD. Deterioration of stored culture media as monitored by a sperm motility bioassay. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988;5(2):76-80.
  23. Weathersbee PS, Francis MM, Macaso TM, Sauer MV, Paulson RJ. A new long shelf life formulation of modified Ham's F-10 medium: biochemical and clinical evaluation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(3):175-9.
  24. Piette C, Mouzon JD, Bachelot A, Spira A. In-vitro fertilization: influence of women's age on pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(1):56-9.
  25. Ziebe S, Loft A, Petersen JH, Andersen A-G, Lindenberg S, Petersen K, et al. Embryo quality and developmental potential is compromised by age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(2):169-74.
  26. Bartolacci A, Pagliardini L, Makieva S, Salonia A, Papaleo E, Viganò P. Abnormal sperm concentration and motility as well as advanced paternal age compromise early embryonic development but not pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 1266 ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(10):1897-903.
  27. Chapuis A, Gala A, Ferrières-Hoa A, Mullet T, Bringer-Deutsch S, Vintejoux E, et al. Sperm quality and paternal age: effect on blastocyst formation and pregnancy rates. Basic Clin Androl. 2017;27:2.
  28. Simon L, Murphy K, Shamsi M, Liu L, Emery B, Aston KI, et al. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(11):2402-12.
  29. Nelissen EC, Van Montfoort AP, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Geraedts JP, Smits LJ, et al. Further evidence that culture media affect perinatal outcome: findings after transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(7):1966-76.