Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia Techniques for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

Authors
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Alzahra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Background: To diminish labor pain, several techniques have been used in developed countries. In the current randomized controlled trial, the use of epidural analgesia via PCEA pump with and without background infusion of analgesic was studied. Methods: In this double-blinded controlled trial, 60 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to study groups for receiving epidural analgesia during labor. All patients received initial bullous dose including 125 mg bupivacaine and 3 mg/ml fentanyl, and the first group patient (CI) received background infusion of 8 ml/hr and the second group (PCEA) received 10 ml bullous dose of 125 mg bupivacaine combined with 100 mcg fentanyl (2 ml) via epidural catheter. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 0-10 was measured 20 min after drug injection. The chi-square and student T-test were used for comparing variables between groups, and 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. Results: There was no significant difference in terms of demographic variables. Mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly lower in patients received continuous infusion (CI) (p<0.0001). However, the total administered fentanyl dose was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCEA (p<0.0001). Besides, the CI group had a significantly lower rate of patient-controlled injection compared to PCEA patients (p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between patients’ satisfaction and VAS in study groups. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia using PCEA combined with continuous infusion did not provide higher analgesia or patients’ satisfaction compared to PCEA alone; however, it led to a decreased rate of drug injection and total administered dosage.
Keywords

  1. Mousa WF, Al-Metwalli R, Mostafa M. Epidural analgesia during labor vs no analgesia: A comparative study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012;6(1):36-40.
  2. Chestnut DH, Wong CA, Tsen LC, Kee WDN, Beilin Y, Mhyre J. Chestnut's obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice. 5th ed. US: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. 1328 p.
  3. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Cohen NH, Young WL. Miller's anesthesia. 8th ed. California: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. 3312 p.
  4. Siddik-Sayyid SM, Taha S, Azar M, Hakki M, Yaman R, Baraka A, et al. Comparison of three doses of epidural fentanyl followed by bupivacaine and fentanyl for labor analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(9):1285-90.
  5. Kalra S, Saraswat N, Agnihotri G. Comparison of efficacy of bupivacaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;4(3):178-81.
  6. Gambling DR, Cole PYC, McMorland GH, Palmer L. A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35(3 (Pt 1)):249-54.
  7. Taylor HJ. Clinical experience with continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine at 6 ml per hour in obstetrics. Can J Anesth J. 1983;30(3 Pt 1):277-85.
  8. Lim Y, Ocampo CE, Supandji M, Teoh WH, Sia AT. A randomized controlled trial of three patient-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for labor. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(6):1968-72.
  9. Ferrante FM, Rosinia FA, Gordon C, Datta S. The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Anesth Analg. 1994;79(1):80-4.
  10. Petry J, Vercauteren M, Van Mol I, Van Houwe P, Adriaensen H. Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2000;51(3):163-6.
  11. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):S160-72.
  12. Slade P, MacPherson S, Hume A, Maresh M. Expectations, experiences and satisfaction with labour. Br J Clin Psychol. 1993;32(Pt 4):469-83.
  13. Hasanein R, El-sayed W, Khalil M. The value of epidural magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to bupivacaine and fentanyl for labor analgesia. Egypt J Anaesth. 2013;29(3):219-24.
  14. Srivastava U, Gupta A, Saxena S, Kumar A, Singh S, Saraswat N, et al. Patient controlled epidural analgesia during labour: effect of addition of background infusion on quality of analgesia & maternal satisfaction. Indian J Anaesth. 2009;53(6):649-53.
  15. Bolukbasi D, Sener E, Sarihasan B, Kocamanoglu S, Tur A. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl and ropivacaine plus fentanyl for labor analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14(4):288-93.
  16. Beilin Y, Bodian CA, Weiser J, Hossain S, Arnold I, Feierman DE, et al. Effect of labor epidural analgesia with and without fentanyl on infant breast-feeding: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(6):1211-7.
  17. Thorp JA, Breedlove G. Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits. Birth. 1996;23(2):63-83.
  18. De Tommaso O, Caporuscio A, Tagariello V. Neurological complications following central neuraxial blocks: are there predictive factors? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19(10):705-16.
  19. Horlocker TT. Complications of spinal and epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000;18(2):461-85.
  20. Bremerich DH, Waibel HJ, Mierdl S, Meininger D, Byhahn C, Zwissler B, et al. Comparison of continuous background infusion plus demand dose and demand-only parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for labor and delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14(2):114-20.
  21. Okutomi T, Saito M, Mochizuki J, Amano K, Hoka S. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with or without a background infusion following initial spinal analgesia for labor pain. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18(1):28-32.
  22. Halpern SH, Carvalho B. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):921-8.
  23. Vallejo MC, Ramesh V, Phelps AL, Sah N. Epidural labor analgesia: continuous infusion versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia with background infusion versus without a background infusion. J Pain. 2007;8(12):970-5.