Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

The Impact of Third Party Reproduction on Family and Kinship

Authors
Zohreh Behjati Ardakani 1
Mehrdad Navabakhsh 2
Soraya Tremayne 3
Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi 4
Fahimeh Ranjbar 5
Alireza Mohseni Tabrizi 6
1 Department of Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Faculty of Humanistic and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Fertility and Reproductive Studies Group (FRSG), Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Oxford, UK
4 Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
5 Nursing Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6 Department of Sociology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.18502/jri.v22i1.4990
Abstract
The development of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the UK, in 1978, proved a major breakthrough in the process of human reproduction, which had remained constant in human history. The impact of IVF and the ensuing assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has not been limited in revolutionizing the "natural" practice of biological reproduction, but has reached out to and affected almost every institution in society. Family and kinship, as the social expression of reproduction and the institutions which are the most transparently structured realm of human life are those most profoundly affected by ARTs. Although literature on the implications of ARTs is in general abundant, this article presents new insights on their impact on family and kinship in Iran, which remains a unique case in the Muslim world. It explores the particular way ARTs, especially third-party donation, have been endorsed and practiced in Iran, and their consequences for the family, the infertile individuals, and their position vis-à-vis their kin and social group. The conclusion points to the lack of clarity concerning the initial rulings by the Islamic jurists, who allowed the practice of ARTs, and which has led to a number of unintended consequences regarding the legal, religious, cultural, and ethical issues, affecting the family, its structure and the relationship between the kin group. These consequences range, inter alia, from the question of the anonymity of third-party donor, to the permissibility of gamete donation between blood relatives, and to the absence of enforceable legislation.
Keywords
Family
Infertility
Kinship
Third party reproduction
  1. Bamford SC. The Cambridge Handbook of kinship. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 2019. 750 p.
  2. Behjati-Ardakani Z, Navabakhsh M, Hosseini SH. Sociological study on the transformation of fertility and childbearing concept in Iran. J Reprod Infertil. 2017;18(1):153-61.
  3. Ginsburg F. Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. 1st ed. California: University of California Press; 1995. 421 p.
  4. Robertson AF. Beyond the family: the social organization of human reproduction. 1st ed. California: Univ of California Press; 1991. 199 p.
  5. Kligman G. The politics of duplicity: Controlling reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. 1st ed. California: Univ of California Press; 1998. 341 p.
  6. Unnithan-Kumar M. Female selective abortion–beyond ‘culture’: family making and gender inequality in a globalising India. Cult Health Sex. 2010;12(2):153-66.
  7. Inhorn M, Van Balen F. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. California: University of California Press; 2002. 315 p.
  8. Hampshire K, Simpson B. Assisted reproductive technologies in the third phase: global encounters and emerging moral worlds. 1st ed. New York: Berghahn Books; 2015. 284 p.
  9. Ginsburg F, Rapp R. The politics of reproduction. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1991;20(1):311-43.
  10. Strathern M. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. 218 p.
  11. Strathern M. Reproducing the future: essays on anthropology, kinship and the new reproductive technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1992. 183 p.
  12. Franklin S. Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. 1st ed. London: Routledge. 1997. 252 p.
  13. Ragoné H. Surrogate motherhood: conception in the heart. 1st ed. Oxford: Westview Press; 1994. 215 p.
  14. Edwards J, Franklin S, Strathern M, Hirsch E, Price F. Technologies of procreation: Kinship in the age of assisted conception. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1999. 256 p.
  15. Carsten J. Cultures of relatedness: new approaches to the study of kinship. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. 191 p.
  16. Carsten J. After kinship. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. 191 p.
  17. Parkin R, Stone L. Kinship and family: an anthropological reader. 1st ed. US: Blackwell Pub; 2004. 496 p.
  18. Inhorn MC. Making muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni versus Shi’a Islam. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2006;30(4):427-50.
  19. Kahn SM, Farquhar J, Appadurai A. Reproducing Jews: a cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. 1st ed. Durham: Duke University Press; 2000. 217 p.
  20. Clarke M. Islam and new kinship: reproductive technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books; 2009. 220 p.
  21. Eich T. Constructing kinship in Sunni Islamic legal texts. Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books; 2012. 285 p.
  22. Houlot S. Islamic Jurisprudence (Figh) and assisted reproduction: establishing limits to avoid social disorders. In: Inhorn MC, Tremayne S, editors. Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books; 2012. p. 53-70.
  23. Inhorn MC, Tremayne S. Islam and assisted reproductive technologies. 1st ed. New York: Berghahn Books; 2012. 285 p.
  24. Ardekani ZB, Akhondi MM, Kamali K, Khalaf ZF, Eskandari S, Ghorbani B. Mental health status of patients attending avicenna infertility clinic. J Reprod Infertil. 2010;11(4):319-24.
  25. Tremayne S, Akhondi MM. Conceiving IVF in Iran. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016;2:62-70.
  26. Tremayne S. The “down side” of gamete donation: challenging “happy family” rhetoric in Iran. Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. 1st ed. New York: Berghahn. 2012. chapter 5. p. 130-56.
  27. Hendriks S, Dondorp W, de Wert G, Hamer G, Repping S, Dancet EA. Potential consequences of clinical application of artificial gametes: a systematic review of stakeholder views. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(3):297-309.
  28. Hermann BP, Sukhwani M, Winkler F, Pascarella JN, Peters KA, Sheng Y, et al. Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation into rhesus testes regenerates spermatogenesis producing functional sperm. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11(5):715-26.
  29. Rafati M, Akhondi MM, Sadeghi MR, Tara SZ, Ghaffari SR. Preimplantation high-resolution HLA sequencing using next generation sequencing. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(8):1575-80.
  30. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähler P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):607-16.
  31. Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Pellicer A, Diaz-Garcia C, Serrano MS, Schmidt KT, et al. Restoration of ovarian activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1503-13.
  32. Sadri-Ardekani H, Akhondi MA, van der Veen F, Repping S, van Pelt AM. In vitro propagation of human prepubertal spermatogonial stem cells. JAMA. 2011;305(23):2416-8.
  33. Marina S, Marina D, Marina F, Fosas N, Galiana N, Jové I. Sharing motherhood: biological lesbian co-mothers, a new IVF indication. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(4):938-41.
  34. Franssen MT, Musters AM, van der Veen F, Repping S, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, et al. Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):467-75.
  35. Ardekani ZB, Akhondi MM, Sadeghi MR, Sadri-Ardekani H. The necessity of a comprehensive study on abortion in Iran. J Reprod Infertil. 2005;6(4):299-320.
  36. Golombok S. Parenting in new family forms. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;15:76-80.
  37. Purewal S, van den Akker OB. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(5):499-515.
  38. Indekeu A, Dierickx K, Schotsmans P, Daniels K, Rober P, D'Hooghe T. Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(6):714-33.
  39. Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):411-26.
  40. Behjati-Ardakani Z, Karoubi MT, Milanifar A, Masrouri R, Akhondi MM. Embryo donation in Iranian legal system: a critical review. J Reprod Infertil. 2015;16(3):130-7.
  41. Al-Hasani S. Islamic consideration (in Suni school) regarding bioethics and ART (especially oocyte and embryo donation) and the law in Germany. Payesh. 2007;6(4):379-84.
  42. Sadeghi Fasaei S, Erfanmanesh I. Methodological foundations of documentary research in the social sciences: a study of the impacts of modernization on the Iranian family. Strategy Culture. 2015;8(29):61-91.
  43. Altorki S. Milk-kinship in Arab society: an unexplored problem in the ethnography of marriage. Ethnology. 1980;19(2):233-44.
  44. Rahbari L. Milk kinship and the maternal body in Shia Islam. De Gruyter. 2020;6:4353.
  45. Castells M. The rise of the network society. USA: John wiley & sons; 2011. 1990 p.
  46. Behjati Ardakani Z, Akhondi MM, Milanifar AR, Modaberi Y, Chamani Tabriz L, Moeeni M, et al. Counseling, evaluation and screening of donor and recipient in third party reproduction and the mat-ching process. Payesh. 2007;6(4):443-51.
  47. Behjati Ardakani Z, Abbasi Shavazi MJ, Shidfar F, Moeini M, Akhondi MM. The effect of ageing on natural and artificial reproduction. Payesh. 2007;6(4):331-45.
  48. Abma JC. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 national survey of family growth. US: CDC; 1997. 101 p.
  49. Braverman AM. Defining, understanding, and managing the complex psychological aspects of third-party reproduction. In: Saure MV, editor. Principles of oocyte and embryo donation. London: Springer; 2013. p. 185-93.
  50. Centers for disease control and prevention. Assisted reproductive technology (ART). USA: Centers for disease control and prevention; 2014 national summary report 2014 Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/art/reports.
  51. Akhondi MM, Kamali K, Ranjbar F, Shirzad M, Shafeghati S, Ardakani ZB, et al. Prevalence of primary infertility in Iran in 2010. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(12):1398-404.
  52. Tremayne S. Law, ethics and donor technologies in Shia Iran. In: Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Inhorn MC, editors. Assisting reproduction, testing genes: global encounters with new biotechnologies. New York: Bergbahn Books;2009. p. 144-64.
  53. Safaiee S. Failures of IRI "Embryo donation act" based on a comparative study. Payesh. 2007;6(4):323-9.
Journal of Reproduction & Infertility
Volume 22, Issue 1
Winter 2021
Pages 3-15