Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Does Embryonic Culture Environment Affect Ploidy Rates in ART Cycles: A Single Center Study in UK

Authors
The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the current study was to assess whether embryonic culture conditions has an impact on embryo ploidy in a preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycle. Methods: In this retrospective single center cohort study, a total of 1099 blastocysts from 278 PGT-A cycles were analyzed. The generated blastocysts were biopsied on days 5 and 6. Inseminated oocytes were allocated in different incubators (benchtop and time lapse) and assisted zona hatching was performed on day 3 of embryo development to facilitate the biopsy process which was performed on days 5 and 6 (blastocyst stage). Results: The average age across the groups was 38.7±3.6 years and the total number of mature eggs was 2912 which were randomly distributed across both incubators. The euploidy rate obtained from both groups showed a higher proportion of euploid embryos in the TLM incubator (37.03%, 95% CI 31.9-42.1) compared to those cultured in the BT incubator (30.4%, 95% CI 23.1-37.7). Regression analysis showed that female age remains to be the key variable driving euploidy rates (0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.88) although incubator type could be an important covariable (0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.59). A subgroup analysis of 74 single euploid embryo transfers showed comparable pregnancy and live birth rates. Conclusion: This large cohort study demonstrates that uninterrupted controlled culture environment provides increased probability to develop euploid embryo in a PGT-A cycle. However, further evaluation is required to assess how environmental culture conditions at a cellular level could affect epigenetic mechanisms in embryo development and higher aneuploidy rate.
Keywords

  1. Hughes C, Association of clinical Embryologists. Association of clinical embryologists-guidelines on good laboratory practice in clinical embryology laboratories 2012. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2012;15(4):174-89.
  2. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(3):534-41.
  3. Munne S, Magli C, Adler A, Wright G, De Boer K, Mortimer D, et al. Treatment related chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(4):780-4.
  4. Gardner DK, Balaban B. Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and ‘OMICS’: is looking good still important? Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22(10):704-18.
  5. Munne S, Alikani M, Ribustello L, Colls P, Martinez-Ortiz P, McCulloh DH, Referring Physician Group. Euploid rates in donor egg cycles significantly differ between fertility centres. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(4):743-9.
  6. Munne S. Status of preimplantation genetic testing and embryo selection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;37(4):393-6.
  7. Mumusoglu S, Ozbek IY, Sokmensuer LK, Polat M, Bozdag G, Papanikolaou E, et al. Duration of blastulation may be associated with ongoing pregnancy rate in single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(6):633-9.
  8. Almedia PA, Bolton VN. The effect of temperature fluctuations on the cytoskeletal organisation and chromosomal constitution of the human oocyte. 1995;3(4):357-65.
  9. Hong KH, Lee H, Forman EJ, Upham KM, Scott Jr RT. Examining the temperature of embryo culture in in vitro fertilizaton: a randomized controlled trial comparing traditional core temperature (37C) to a more physiologic, cooler temperature (36C). Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):767-73.
  10. Wells D, Kaur K, Grifo J, Glassner M, Taylor JC, Fragouli E, et al Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. J Med Genet. 2014;51(8):553-62.
  11. Alhelou Y, Adenan NA, Ali J. Embryo culture conditions are significantly improved during uninterrupted incubation: a randomised control trial. Reprod Biol. 2017;18(1):40-5.
  12. Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Thornton S. Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(2):140-6.
  13. Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, Novara PV, Lain M, De Ponti E, Turchi D, et al. Focused time-lapse analysis reveals novel aspects of human fertilisation and suggests new parameters of embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(1):23-31.
  14. Desai N, Goldberg J, Austin C, Falcone T. Are cleavage anomolises, multinucleation, or specific cell cycle kinetics observed with time-lapse imaging predictive of embryo development capacity or ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):665-74.
  15. Mantikou E, Wong KM, Repping S, Mastenbroek S. Molecular origin of mitotic aneuplodies in preimplantation embryos. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1822(12):1921-30.
  16. Bean CJ, Hassold TJ, Judis L, Hunt PA. Fertilisation in vitro increases non-disjunction during early cleavge division in a mouse model system. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(9):2362-7.
  17. Sunde A, Brison D, Dumoulin J, Harper J, Lundin K, Magli MC, et al. Time to take human embryo culture seriously. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2174-82.