Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Commitment Theory as the Theoretical Framework in Third-Party Reproduction

Authors
Zohreh Behjati Ardakani 1
Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi 2
Amir Hossein Khodaparast 3
Fahimeh Ranjbar 4
Mehrdad Navabakhsh 5
1 Department of Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
3 Iranian Institute of Philosophy, Tehran, Iran
4 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Faculty of Humanistic and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
10.18502/jri.v24i1.11903
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) and third-party reproduction provide the opportunity for infertile couples to have children through different genetic links. This type of treatment has created many challenges for infertile couples. With this treatment, the infertile couple will have a child who is biologically related to the gamete/embryo donor. Accordingly, the transformation that occurs in the structure of traditional families and the concept of parenthood is one of the main consequences and challenges which requires in-depth research. In spite of the successful expansion of infertility treatment and third-party reproduction, there is still no proper social context for implementing third-party infertility treatments in Iran. Therefore, despite the need to use the technology, some couples refuse the treatment unless their confidentiality is preserved. Many couples follow the practice surreptitiously by keeping the donation treatment confidential, to get rid of the existing social stigma and protect their identity, the child and the donor’s identity. Commitment theory as a theoretical strategy is proposed to solve the problems of all parties involved in this type of "social and non-biological" parenting. Commitment theory in the context of third-party reproduction expresses the commitment to the contract accepted by the donor and the recipient of the gamete/embryo, based on which, the recipients consider the resulting child as their own, and are committed to all the related paternal-maternal rights and duties such as "alimony" and "inheritance". On the other hand, the donors undertake to waive all their paternal-maternal rights and duties by donating gamete/embryo.
Keywords
Commitment theory
donation
Infertility treatment
third
party reproduction
  1. Dyer SJ. The value of children in African countries–insights from studies on infertility. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2007;28(2):69-77.
  2. Martins MV, Basto-Pereira M, Pedro J, Peterson B, Almeida V, Schmidt L, et al. Male psychological adaptation to unsuccessful medically assisted reproduction treatments: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(4):466-78.
  3. Akhondi MM, Behjati Ardakani Z, Arefi S, Sadri Ardakani H, Arabi M, Zarnani A, et al. A close look at natural and in vitro fertilization as well as the need for donated gametes in treatment of infertility. Payesh. 2007;6(4):307-21.
  4. Hendriks S, Dondorp W, de Wert G, Hamer G, Repping S, Dancet EA. Potential consequences of clinical application of artificial gametes: a systematic review of stakeholder views. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(3):297-309.
  5. Darbandi S, Darbandi M, Khorram Khorshid HR, Sadeghi MR, Agarwal A, Sengupta P, et al. Ooplasmic transfer in human oocytes: efficacy and concerns in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):77.
  6. Tremayne S, Akhondi MM. Conceiving IVF in Iran. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016;2:62-70.
  7. Behjati Ardakani Z, Navabakhsh M, Ranjbar F, Akhondi MM, Mohseni Tabrizi A. Step-by-step decision-making process in third party assisted reproduction: a qualitative study. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022;25(3):487-98.
  8. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Nasrabad HB, Ardekani ZB, Akhondi MM. Attitudes of infertile women towards gamete donation: a case study in Tehran. J Reprod Infertil. 2006;7(2):139-48.
  9. Sheibani S. Whither kinship? new assisted reproduction technology practices, authoritative knowledge and relatedness-case studies from Iran. Payesh. 2007;6(4):299-306.
  10. Golombok S. Parenting in new family forms. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;15:76-80.
  11. Silber SJ. Judaism and reproductive technology. Cancer Treat Res. 2010;156:471-80.
  12. Sallam HN, Sallam NH. Religious aspects of assisted reproduction. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016;8(1):33-48.
  13. Al-Bar MA, Chamsi-Pasha H. Assisted reproductive technology: Islamic perspective. In: Al-Bar MA, Chamsi-Pasha H, editors. Contemporary bioethics. Germany: Springer; 2015. p. 173-86.
  14. Inhorn MC. Making muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in sunni versus shi’a islam. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2006;30(4):427-50.
  15. Inhorn MC, Tremayne S. Islam and assisted reproductive technologies. 1st ed. New York: Berghahn Books; 2012. 346 p.
  16. Al-Hasani S. Islamic consideration (in suni school) regarding bioethics and ART (especially oocyte and embryo donation) and the law in Germany. Payesh. 2007;6(4):379-84.
  17. Serour GI, Dickens BM. Assisted reproduction developments in the islamic world. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;74(2):187-93.
  18. Safaiee SH. Failures of IRI “embryo donation act” based on a comparative study. Payesh. 2007;6(4):323-29.
  19. Act of embryo donation. Islamic Parliament of Iran. Official Gazette No. 17033.. 2003; No.17033.
  20. Executive by law of the Act of Embryo Donation. Official Gazette. 2005; No.17496.
  21. Behjati-Ardakani Z, Karoubi MT, Milanifar A, Masrouri R, Akhondi MM. Embryo donation in Iranian legal system: a critical review. J Reprod Infertil. 2015;16(3):130-7.
  22. Greenfeld DA. Effects and outcomes of third-party reproduction: parents. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):520-4.
  23. Katoozian N. [Civil law, public theory of obligations]. 8nd ed. Tehran; Mizan Publication;2015. 912 p. Persian.
  24. United Nations. General Assembly. Universal declaration of human rights. Department of State, United States of America. 1949;302(2):14-25.
  25. An-Na'im AA. Human rights in the Arab world: a regional perspective. Hum Rts Q. 2001;23:701.
  26. Al-Midani MA. Arab Charter Committee of Human Rights. Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2022. p. 135-9. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903621.arab.charter.committee.hrdoi: 10.4337/9781789903621.arab.charter.committee.hr
  27. Hill JL. What does it mean to be a" parent"? The claims of biology as the basis for parental rights. In Parental rights and responsibilities. 1nd ed. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 29-96.
  28. Stumpf AE. Redefining mother: a legal matrix for new reproductive technologies. Yale Law J. 1986;96(1):187-208.
  29. Shultz MM. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality. Wis L Rev. 1990;1990(2):297-398.
  30. Gheaus A. The right to parent one's biological baby. 2012.
  31. Golombok S, Murray C, Brinsden P, Abdalla H. Social versus biological parenting: family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999;40(4):519-27.
  32. Schenker JG. Assisted reproduction practice: religious perspectives. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10(3):310-9.
  33. Narayan U. Family Ties: Rethinking parental claims in the light of surrogacy and custody. In: Narayan U, Bartkowiak J, editors. Having and raising children: Unconventional families, hard choices, and the social good. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania state university press; 1999. p. 65-86. https://philpapers.org/rec/NARHAR
  34. Klock SC, Greenfeld DA. Parents’ knowledge about the donors and their attitudes toward disclosure in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1575-9.
Journal of Reproduction & Infertility
Volume 24, Issue 1
Winter 2023
Pages 3-10