Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

The Effect of Uterine Contractions on Fertility Outcomes in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Cohort Study

Authors
Shahid Akbar-Abadi Clinical Research Development Unit, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background: The relationship between uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer and the success of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) has not been properly investigated. In this study, the effect of uterine contractions on embryo implantation in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles was investigated to determine whether the frequency of uterine contractions can be used as a quantitative marker to assess endometrial receptivity. Methods: In this cohort study of 68 eligible FET candidates, one hour before embryo transfer (ET), frequency of uterine contractions was assessed with transvaginal ultrasonography. Patients were followed up for 20 weeks. The association between FET outcomes including clinical pregnancy, abortion, and ectopic pregnancy with uterine contractions was evaluated. Binary logistic regression was conducted to test the association between clinical pregnancy outcomes in different groups. The p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Of 68 patients, 25 (36.8%) experienced clinical pregnancy. Multiple logistic regression for omitted confounders (age, BMI, duration, type and cause of infertility) revealed that patients with uterine peristaltic wave frequency less than 2≤ wave/min had higher chance of successful pregnancy compared to those with ≥4 wave/min (odds ratio: 10.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-79.4, p=0.019). The Pearson's correlation showed a statistically significant relationship between the frequency of uterine contraction and endometrial thickness (r= 0.42, p=0.002). Conclusion: Patients with uterine peristalsis of <4.0 wave/min before embryo transfer had a higher chance of successful implantation and pregnancy compared with those with higher contraction frequencies. It seems that measuring uterine contraction frequency before embryo transfer might help to predict pregnancy outcomes.
Keywords

  1. Taylor HS, Pal L, Sell E. Speroff's clinical gyneco-logic endocrinology and infertility. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. 973 p.
  2. Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1755-61.
  3. Szamatowicz M. Assisted reproductive technology in reproductive medicine-possibilities and limitations. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(12):820-3.
  4. Lahav-Baratz S, Koifman M, Shiloh H, Ishai D, Wiener-Megnazi Z, Dirnfeld M. Analyzing factors affecting the success rate of frozen–thawed embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(11):444-8.
  5. Baker VL, Jones CE, Cometti B, Hoehler F, Salle B, Urbancsek J, et al. Factors affecting success rates in two concurrent clinical IVF trials: an examination of potential explanations for the difference in pregnancy rates between the United States and Europe. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1287-91.
  6. Younglai EV, Holloway AC, Foster WG. Environmental and occupational factors affecting fertility and IVF success. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(1):43-57.
  7. Bretherick KL, Fairbrother N, Avila L, Harbord SH, Robinson WP. Fertility and aging: do reproductive-aged Canadian women know what they need to know? Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2162-8.
  8. Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, De Mouzon J, Erb K, D'Hooghe T, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(10):2099-113.
  9. Shen C, Shu D, Zhao X, Gao Y. Comparison of clinical outcomes between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12(6):409-14.
  10. Li M, Xie Y, Park H, Kumar A, Hubert G, Buyalos R. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer improves clinical outcomes in patients receiving IVF treatment. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):S177.
  11. Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, van Katwijk C, Lo CR, Hoogland HJ. Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(4):746-9.
  12. Bulletti C, de Ziegler D, Polli V, Diotallevi L, Ferro ED, Flamigni C. Uterine contractility during the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2000;15 Suppl 1:81-9.
  13. Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, Olivennes F, Schönauer LM, Frydman R. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1115-9.
  14. Zhu L, Xiao L, Che H, Li Y, Liao J. Uterine peristalsis exerts control over fluid migration after mock embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(2):279-85.
  15. Kuijsters NPM, Methorst WG, Kortenhorst MSQ, Rabotti C, Mischi M, Schoot BC. Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(1):50-71.
  16. Hunt S, Abdallah KS, Ng E, Rombauts L, Vollenhoven B, Mol BW. Impairment of uterine contractility is associated with unexplained infertility. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(1):61-73.
  17. Zhu L, Che H, Xiao L, Li Y. Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1238-43.
  18. Lesny P, Killick S, Tetlow R, Robinson J, Maguiness S. Embryo transfer--can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions? Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1540-6.
  19. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(7):1968-74.
  20. Chung CHS, Wong AWY, Chan CPS, Saravelos SH, Kong GWS, Cheung LP, et al. The changing pattern of uterine contractions before and after fresh embryo transfer and its relation to clinical outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(3):240-7.
  21. Blank C, Sammali F, Kuijsters N, Huang Y, Rabotti C, de Sutter P, et al. Assessment of uterine activity during IVF by quantitative ultrasound imaging: a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(6):1045-53.
  22. Kim A, Lee JY, Ji YI, Lee HH, Lee ES, Kim HY, et al. Do endometrial movements affect the achievement of pregnancy during intrauterine insemination? Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8(4):399-408.
  23. Check JH, Dietterich C, Graziano V, Lurie D, Choe JK. Effect of maximal endometrial thickness on outcome after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1399-400.
  24. Groenewoud ER, Cohlen BJ, Al‐Oraiby A, Brinkhuis EA, Broekmans FJ, de Bruin JP, et al. Influence of endometrial thickness on pregnancy rates in modified natural cycle frozen‐thawed embryo transfer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(7):808-15.
  25. Richter KS, Bugge KR, Bromer JG, Levy MJ. Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):53-9.
  26. Bu Z, Sun Y. The impact of endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration on ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with different ovarian response. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145703.
  27. Wang Y, Zhu Y, Sun Y, Di W, Qiu M, Kuang Y, et al. Ideal embryo transfer position and endometrial thickness in IVF embryo transfer treatment. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(3):282-8.
  28. Xu J, Zhang S, Jin L, Mao Y, Shi J, Huang R, et al. The effects of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of over 40,000 cycles among five reproductive centers in China. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;12:788706.