Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Evaluation of the Effect of Embryo Transfer Methods on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Study and Future Perspectives

Authors
Samira Azimi 1
Shahrzad Zadeh Modarres 2
Mahsa Esgandari 3
Saba Abdollahzadeh Fahimi 3
Ramina Fazeli 4
1 Clinical Research Development Center, Mahdieh Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mahdieh Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Alborz, Iran
10.18502/jri.v25i2.16008
Abstract
Background: Trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) are used for embryo transfer. However, few studies were conducted to compare the methods and assess their effect on pregnancy outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Mahdieh Hospital in Tehran, analyzing 506 ICSI cycles with fresh embryo transfer. The study period was from April 2019 to March 2022. Following the evaluation of patients’ profile, they were divided into two groups of TAUS (n=250) and TVUS (n=256). The pregnancy outcomes included positive test of β-HCG, history of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy (EP), clinical pregnancy, and the duration of the embryo transfer were compared between two groups. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression were used for data analysis. Results: The rate of chemical and clinical pregnancy in the TAUS group was higher compared to the TVUS group, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The rate of live term birth and live preterm birth was higher in the TAUS group compared to the TVUS group, though the difference was insignificant. Moreover, EP and abortion rates were higher in TVUS group compared to the TAUS group, but the differences were not statistically significant. The odds ratio of achieving pregnancy was higher with TAUS compared to TVUS, but this was only statistically significant for the age variable. Conclusion: The use of TAUS method appears to be associated with improved pregnancy outcome, including higher rates of chemical and clinical pregnancy, compared to TVUS. Yet, further research is needed to confirm these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.
Keywords
Abdominal Ultrasound
Embryo transfer
Infertility
Pregnancy Outcomes
Vaginal ultrasound
  1. Carson SA, Kallen AN. Diagnosis and management of infertility: a review. JAMA. 2021;326(1):65-76.
  2. Seivani MK, Modabber N, Shadpirouz M, Amiri BS, Bahoorzahi P, Bahraminia S. Evaluation of genes and molecular pathway related pathogenesis of endometriosis: a bioinformatics approach. Inform Med Unlocked. 2023;41:101324.
  3. Walker Z, Gunn D. Review of infertility diagnosis and evaluation. Curr Obst Gynecol Rep. 2021;10 (4):77-82
  4. Andrus M. Exhibition and film about miscarriage, infertility, and stillbirth: art therapy implications. Art ther. 2020;37(4):169-76.
  5. Lehmann P, Vélez MP, Saumet J, Lapensée L, Jamal W, Bissonnette F, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): a reliable biomarker of oocyte quality in IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(4):493-8.
  6. Feizollahi N, Zayeri ZD, Moradi N, Zargar M, Rezaeeyan H. The effect of coagulation factors polymorphisms on abortion. Front Biol. 2018;13:190-6.
  7. Sigalos G, Triantafyllidou O, Vlahos N. How do laboratory embryo transfer techniques affect IVF outcomes? a review of current literature. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017;20(1):3-13.
  8. Masroor MJ, Asl LY, Sarchami N. The effect of uterine contractions on fertility outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study. J Reprod Infertil. 2023;24(2):132-8.
  9. Saravelos SH, Wong AW, Kong GW, Huang J, Klitzman R, Li TC. Pain during embryo transfer is independently associated with clinical pregnancy in fresh/frozen assisted reproductive technology cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(6):684-93.
  10. Ghaemi M, Hantoushzadeh S, Shafiee A, Gargari OK, Fathi H, Eshraghi N, et al. The effect of COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 vaccination on serum anti‐Mullerian hormone: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024;12(1): e1136.
  11. Larue L, Keromnes G, Massari A, Roche C, Moulin J, Gronier H, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in IVF. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(5):411-6.
  12. Tran HP, Tran TT, Le LT, Pham BT, Vu SNT, Ly LT, et al. The impact of an endometrial receptivity array on personalizing embryo transfer for patients with infertility: a meta-analysis. FS Rev. 2022;3(3):157-73.
  13. Khanjani S, Farahbod F, Zarean E, Tarrahi MJ, Mohammadi B. Evaluation of the relation between cerebroplacental ratio, umbilical-cerebral ratio, and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio with the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Immunopathol Persa. 2023;X(X):e39503.
  14. Farahbod F, Zarean E, Khanjani S, Moezzi M, Mohammadizadeh F, Shabanian S. Relationship between placental thickness, grading, and heterogeneity in fetal growth restriction in the third trimester of pregnancy by ultrasonography and pathology tests and their relationship with estimated fetal weight and neonatal outcome. Immunopathol Persa. 2023;X(X):e39471.
  15. Porat N, Boehnlein LM, Schouweiler CM, Kang J, Lindheim SR. Interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing abdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(2):384-92.
  16. Barton SE, Politch JA, Benson CB, Ginsburg ES, Gargiulo AR. Transabdominal follicular aspiration for oocyte retrieval in patients with ovaries inaccessible by transvaginal ultrasound. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1773-6.
  17. Wageh A, Abdelhafez MS, Shams M. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) guided versus transabdominal sonography (TAS) guided embryo transfer: A retrospective analysis. Middle East Fertil Soci J. 2018;23(4):431-4.
  18. Karavani G, Ben-Meir A, Shufaro Y, Hyman JH, Revel A. Transvaginal ultrasound to guide embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1159-65.
  19. Mohamed Hassan S, Ramadan W, Elsharkawy M, Ali Bayoumi Y. The role of transvaginal ultrasound guided embryo transfer to improve pregnancy rate in obese patients undergoing Intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:861-7.
  20. Malekkheili PG, Zadehmodarres S, Heidar Z. A comparative study of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound guidance on consequences of embryo transfer at Mahdiyeh hospital of Tehran in 2020: An RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2022;20(3):169-76..
  21. Medhat Mohamed A, Mahmoud El Khyat A, El Shahat El Gergawy A, El Sayed El Halwagy A, Salah El Deen Hamouda M. Trans vaginal versus Trans abdominal ultrasound guided embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization and intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF–ICSI). J Adv Med Med Res. 2021;33(23):145-52.
  22. Samy AA, El-Kassar YS, Gaafar SS, Hamza HA, Menshawi SS. Comparison between transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a randomized, prospective trial. Menoufia Med J. 2020;33(2):419.
  23. Tiras B, Polat M, Korucuoglu U, Zeyneloglu HB, Yarali H. Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1341-5.
  24. Zhu W, Yeung Q, Chan D, Chi L, Huang J, Wang Q, et al. Maternal β-HCG concentrations in early IVF pregnancy: association with the embryo development stage of blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(5):683-90.
  25. Nasri H. Renal effects of hydatiform mole and choriocarcinoma. J Ren Endocrinol. 2023;9:e25097.
Journal of Reproduction & Infertility
Volume 25, Issue 2
Spring 2024
Pages 140-147