Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Cervical Anatomical Characteristics in Women with Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Approach

Authors
1 Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Artificial Intelligence, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Radiology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Artificial Intelligence, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran; USERN Office, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Abstract
Background: Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder which causes dysmenorrhea and infertility. Early diagnosis of endometriosis can help prevent the necessity for invasive diagnostic procedures. Medical imaging has been widely utilized to diagnose various diseases without the need for invasive procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cervical length in women with endometriosis. Methods: In this case-control study, the case group consisted of nulliparous women with endometriosis, while the control group comprised nulliparous women without endometriosis. A total of 42 individuals were included in each group. Cervical length was measured using transvaginal ultrasound from the external os to the internal os. The patients in the case group underwent laparoscopy to confirm the diagnosis. Pearson chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were employed to compare categorical variables with a p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: In both groups, there were no notable variations in any of the demographic characteristics. However, the severity of dysmenorrhea was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.01). The average diameter of the mediolateral cervix (29.48±6.2 and 27.14±3.8) was statistically significant between the patient group and control group, respectively (p=0.04). The mediolateral width may have a positive predictive effect on the presence of endometriosis, while cervical length appears to have a protective effect against endometriosis. Conclusion: Demographic data do not predict endometriosis. This study suggests that mediolateral width in transvaginal sonography can serve as a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for endometriosis, showing correlation with endometriosis symptoms like dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia.
Keywords

  1. Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, Laufer MR, Leyland N, Missmer SA, et al. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):354.e1-354.e12.
  2. Vitale SG, Capriglione S, Peterlunger I, La Rosa VL, Vitagliano A, Noventa M, et al. The role of oxidative stress and membrane transport systems during endometriosis: a fresh look at a busy corner. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:7924021.
  3. Davoodi P, J Ghadimi D, Rezaei M, Khazei Tabari MA, Shirani A, Nouri B, et al. Endometriosis and COVID-19: Clinical presentation and quality of life, a systematic review. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2023;8(4):315-26.
  4. Della Corte L, Di Filippo C, Gabrielli O, Reppuccia S, La Rosa VL, Ragusa R, et al. The burden of endometriosis on women’s lifespan: a narrative overview on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4683.
  5. Benacerraf BR, Groszmann Y. Sonography should be the first imaging examination done to evaluate patients with suspected endometriosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(4):651-3.
  6. Tripoli TM, Sato H, Sartori MG, de Araujo FF, Girão MJ, Schor E. Evaluation of quality of life and sexual satisfaction in women suffering from chronic pelvic pain with or without endometriosis. J Sex Med. 2011;8(2):497-503.
  7. Sherif MF, Badawy ME, Elkholi DG. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med. 2015;46(1):159-65.
  8. Bagaria SJ, Rasalkar DD, Paunipagar BK. Imaging tools for endometriosis: role of ultrasound, MRI and other imaging modalities in diagnosis and planning intervention. Endometriosis Basic Concepts Curr Res Trends. 2012;24:437-47.
  9. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Piccione E. Ultrasound imaging for ovarian and deep infiltrating endo-metriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35(1):5-24.
  10. Marcellin L, Santulli P, Pinzauti S, Bourdon M, Lamau MC, Borghese B, et al. Age at menarche does not correlate with the endometriosis phenotype. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219497.
  11. Nnoaham KE, Webster P, Kumbang J, Kennedy SH, Zondervan KT. Is early age at menarche a risk factor for endometriosis? a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):702-12.e6.
  12. Waller KG, Shaw RW. Risk factors for endo-metriosis: menstrual and life-style characteristics. Med Principles Pract. 1998;7(2):127-33.
  13. Tang Y, Zhao M, Lin L, Gao Y, Chen GQ, Chen S, et al. Is body mass index associated with the incidence of endometriosis and the severity of dysmenorrhoea: a case–control study in China? BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e037095.
  14. Selçuk A, Bayraktar M, Gürbüz A, Alkan A, Sadiye E. Uterine junctional zone thickness, cervical length and bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition in women with endometriosis. Balkan Med J. 2012;29(4):410-3.
  15. Tajeran Gh, Derakhshan R, Jayervand F, Rahimi M, Hajari P, Hashemi N. The predictive value of transvaginal cervical length and cervical angle ultrasonography in term delivery outcomes: a cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2406344.
  16. Tosti C, Zupi E, Exacoustos C. Could the uterine junctional zone be used to identify early-stage endometriosis in women? Womens Health (Lond). 2014;10(3):225-7.