Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Time-Lapse Evaluation of Embryos in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA): High Rate of 1PN Fertilization and Rapid Embryo Development in TESE Compared to Ejaculated Sperm

Authors
1 Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Health Science Institute, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey
4 Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, Istanbul, Turkey
5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract
Background: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), marked by impaired spermatogenesis, poses challenges in assisted reproduction. Limited data exist comparing chromosomal integrity of testicular versus ejaculated sperm. This study aimed to compare embryo morphokinetics, fertilization abnormalities, and PGT-A outcomes between embryos from ejaculated and testicular sperm in NOA cases. Subjects and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 397 patients from two IVF centers (2015–2023), with 317 using ejaculated sperm and 80 using testicular sperm from NOA patients. Fertilization patterns (2PN, 1PN, ≥3PN), embryo morphokinetics, and aneuploidy rates were assessed. Logistic regression examined factors influencing aneuploidy including male and female age, recurrent implantation failure (RIF), hormone levels, and oocyte quality, while chi-square and t-tests compared groups, with significance at p<0.05. Results: Embryos derived from testicular sperm developed faster than those from ejaculated sperm (p<0.05). The 2PN fertilization rate was significantly lower, while the 1PN rate was higher in the testicular sperm group (10.1% vs. 16.4%, p=0.020). The rates of ≥3PN anomalies and embryo aneuploidy were similar between groups (p>0.05). Logistic regression identified male age (p=0.001), female age (p=0.007), and RIF (p=0.047) as significant predictors of aneuploidy. Conclusion: Our study identified advanced parental age and RIF as key predictors of embryo aneuploidy. PGT-A may improve outcomes, especially for older patients or those with RIF, regardless of sperm origin. Embryos from testicular sperm in NOA patients develop faster morphokinetically but show a higher rate of 1PN fertilization than those from ejaculated sperm.
Keywords

  1. Practice committee of the American society for reproductive medicine. Management of nonobstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1239-45.
  2. Tao Y. Endocrine aberrations of human nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl. 2022;24(3):274-86.
  3. Chen X, Ma Y, Zou S, Wang S, Qiu J, Xiao Q, et al. Comparison and outcomes of nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different etiology undergoing microTESE and ICSI treatments. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(4):366-73.
  4. Tharakan T, Luo R, Jayasena CN, Minhas S. Non-obstructive azoospermia: current and future perspectives. Fac Rev. 2021;10:7.
  5. Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):31-5.
  6. Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(5):1099-103.e1-3.
  7. Caroppo E, Colpi EM, Gazzano G, Vaccalluzzo L, Scroppo FI, D’Amato G, et al. Testicular histology may predict the successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing conventional TESE: a diagnostic accuracy study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(1):149-54.
  8. McLachlan RI, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Hoei-Hansen CE, de Kretser DM, Skakkebaek NE. Histological evaluation of the human testis--approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: mini review. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):2-16.
  9. Deruyver Y, Vanderschueren D, van der Aa F. Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology. 2014;2(1):20-4.
  10. Alkandari MH, Zini A. Medical management of non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2021;19(3):215-20.
  11. Koşar PA, Özçelik N, Koşar A. Cytogenetic abnormalities detected in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(1):17-21.
  12. Peña VN, Kohn TP, Herati AS. Genetic mutations contributing to non-obstructive azoospermia. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34(6):101479.
  13. Cerván-Martín M, Castilla JA, Palomino-Morales RJ, Carmona FD. Genetic landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia and new perspectives for the clinic. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):300.
  14. Wang D, Chen R, Kong S, Pan QY, Zheng YH, Qiu WJ, et al. Cytogenic and molecular studies of male infertility in cases of Y chromosome balanced reciprocal translocation. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(2):2051-4.
  15. Cioppi F, Rosta V, Krausz C. Genetics of azoospermia. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3264.
  16. Buran A, Tulay P, Dayıoğlu N, Bakircioglu ME, Bahceci M, İrez T. Evaluation of the morphokinetic parameters and development of pre-implantation embryos obtained by testicular, epididymal and ejaculate spermatozoa using time-lapse imaging system. Andrologia. 51(4):e13217.
  17. Palermo GD, Colombero LT, Hariprashad JJ, Schlegel PN, Rosenwaks Z. Chromosome analysis of epididymal and testicular sperm in azoospermic patients undergoing ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):570-5.
  18. Weng SP, Surrey MW, Danzer HC, Hill DL, Chen PC, Wu TC. Chromosome abnormalities in embryos derived from microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and testicular sperm extraction. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(2):202-5.
  19. Scarselli F, Casciani V, Cursio E, Muzzì S, Colasante A, Gatti S, et al. Influence of human sperm origin, testicular or ejaculated, on embryo morphokinetic development. Andrologia. 2018;50(8):e13061.
  20. Shah R. Surgical sperm retrieval: techniques and their indications. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(1):102-9.
  21. Practice committee of the American society for reproductive medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):e18-25.
  22. Van Marion ES, Speksnijder JP, Hoek J, Boellaard WP, Dinkelman-Smit M, Chavli EA, et al. Time-lapse imaging of human embryos fertilized with testicular sperm reveals an impact on the first embryonic cell cycle. Biol Reprod. 2021;104(6):1218-27.
  23. Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman LR, Austin C, Goldberg J, Falcone T. Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:54.
  24. Desai N, Gill P, Tadros NN, Goldberg JM, Sabanegh E, Falcone T. Azoospermia and embryo morphokinetics: testicular sperm-derived embryos exhibit delays in early cell cycle events and increased arrest prior to compaction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1339-48.
  25. Lammers J, Reignier A, Splingart C, Catteau A, David L, Barriere P, et al. Does sperm origin affect embryo morphokinetic parameters? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(9):1325-32.
  26. Kai Y, Moriwaki H, Yumoto K, Iwata K, Mio Y. Assessment of developmental potential of human single pronucleated zygotes derived from conventional in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(8):1377-84.
  27. Dozortsev D, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Behaviour of spermatozoa in human oocytes displaying no or one pronucleus after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(11):2139-44.
  28. Goud P, Goud A, Van Oostveldt P, Van der Elst J, Dhont M. Fertilization abnormalities and pronucleus size asynchrony after intracytoplasmic sperm injection are related to oocyte postmaturity. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(2):245-52.
  29. Van der Heijden GW, Van den Berg IM, Baart EB, Derijck AA, Martini E, De Boer P. Parental origin of chromatin in human monopronuclear zygotes revealed by asymmetric histone methylation patterns, differs between IVF and ICSI. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009;76(1):101-8.
  30. Liao Q, Zhang Q, Feng X, Huang H, Xu H, Tian B, et al. Development of deep learning algorithms for predicting blastocyst formation and quality by time-lapse monitoring. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1): 415.
  31. Hirata K, Goto S, Izumi Y, Taguchi M, Hayashi A, Fujioka M, et al. Chromosome analysis of blastocysts derived from single pronuclear zygotes by array CGH and clinical outcomes by the transfer of single pronuclear zygotes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(7):1645-52.
  32. Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsøe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohí J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(10):2658-71.
  33. Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Ingerslev HJ. Hatching of in vitro fertilized human embryos is influenced by fertilization method. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1277-82.
  34. Berntsen J, Rimestad J, Lassen JT, Tran D, Kragh MF. Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0262661.
  35. Arumugam M, Shetty DP, Kadandale JS, Nalilu SK. Association of sperm aneuploidy frequency and DNA fragmentation index in infertile men. J Reprod Infertil. 2019;20(3):121-26.
  36. Garolla A, Ghezzi M, Cosci I, Sartini B, Bottacin A, Engl B, et al. FSH treatment in infertile males candidate to assisted reproduction improved sperm DNA fragmentation and pregnancy rate. Endocrine. 2017;56(2):416-25.
  37. Garrisi JG, Colls P, Ferry KM, Zheng X, Garrisi MG, Munné S. Effect of infertility, maternal age, and number of previous miscarriages on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):288-95.
  38. Won SY, Kim H, Lee WS, Kim JW, Shim SH. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(1):95-101.
  39. Mei Y, Wang Y, He L, Zheng J, Lin Y, Wang F. Performance of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss and repeated implantation failure. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e31983.