Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Journal of Reproduction & Infertility

Embryo Culture Systems and Morphokinetics in IVF: The Role of Time-Lapse Monitoring and Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Selection

Authors
Sanaz Ashouri Movassagh 1
Mahnaz Heidari 1
Sepideh Ashouri Movassagh 2
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi 1
1 Department of Andrology and Embryology, Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Tehran, Iran
2 Human and Animal Cell Bank, Iranian Biological Resource Center (IBRC), Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background: Embryo selection and culture conditions are critical determinants of success in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite advances, implantation and live birth rates following in vitro fertilization (IVF) remain suboptimal. This systematic review evaluated the effects of embryo culture media (sequential versus single-step), time-lapse monitoring (TLM), and artificial intelligence (AI)-based embryo selection on IVF outcomes. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through June 2025. Twenty-nine studies involving over 18,500 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were included. Methodological quality was assessed using RoB2, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and CLAIM according to study design. Outcomes related to culture media, TLM-derived morphokinetics, and AI-based embryo assessment were synthesized narratively. Results: Sequential and single-step culture media produced comparable clinical outcomes, although single-step media showed a modest increase in blastocyst formation (57.1% vs. 53.2%; p=0.03). No significant differences were observed in clinical pregnancy or live birth rates. TLM was associated with higher ongoing pregnancy rates in descriptive analyses (45.1% vs. 34.8%; p<0.01) and reduced early pregnancy loss. AI-based embryo selection demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUC 0.76–0.91), although clinical validation varied across algorithms, indicating differences in predictive accuracy rather than consistent improvements in clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Culture media selection appears to have limited influence on clinical outcomes, whereas TLM and AI-assisted embryo selection show promise for improving embryo assessment. Integration of validated AI-driven TLM systems into IVF practice may enhance embryo selection efficiency. Further large, prospective studies are needed to establish standardized clinical protocols.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence
Culture media
Embryo evaluation
In vitro fertilization
Pregnancy rate
time
lapse imaging
  1. Sfontouris IA, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Viana IG, Navarro PA, Raine-Fenning N, et al. Blastocyst culture using single versus sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(10):1261-72.
  2. Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Rapani A, Giannelou P, Anifandis G, Bolaris S, et al. Considerations regarding embryo culture conditions: from media to epigenetics. In Vivo. 2018;32(3):451-60.
  3. Sachedina Parhar A, Mellor A, Moeed S, Grover SR. Accessory uterine cavities: a review of cases and an appeal for standard terminology. Fertil Steril. 2025;123(6):1101-13.
  4. Xi Q, Yang Q, Wang M, Huang B, Zhang B, Li Z, et al. Individualized embryo selection strategy developed by stacking machine learning model for better in vitro fertilization outcomes: an application study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19(1):53.
  5. Sacks GC, Mozes H, Ronn R, Elder-Geva T, Schonberger O, Ben-Ami I, et al. Time-lapse incubation for embryo culture-morphokinetics and environmental stability may not be enough: Results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1701.
  6. Lundin K, Park H. Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection. Ups J Med Sci. 2020;125(2):77-84.
  7. Ribeiro IB. Mechanisms and effects of cell density of embryos in culture in in vitro fertilization processes in embryonary development [master's thesis]. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa; 2021. 84 p.
  8. Khosravi P, Kazemi E, Zhan Q, Malmsten JE, Toschi M, Zisimopoulos P, et al. Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization. NPJ Digital Med. 2019;2:21.
  9. Berntsen J, Rimestad J, Lassen JT, Tran D, Kragh MF. Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0262661.
  10. Shoham Z. Can elective single embryo transfer (eSET) with AI integration become the future of IVF? J IVF Worldw. 2025;3(1):32-41.
  11. Bohlin T, Kurkkio E, Adolfsson E, Berntsen J, Johansen MN, Apter S, et al. Comparison of the deep learning tool iDAScore® and the current annotation model, KIDScore™ D5, for finding the embryo with best chance of pregnancy after elective single blastocyst transfer: a randomized multi-centre prospective pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024;48(Suppl 1):104025.
  12. Liu H, Zhang Z, Gu Y, Dai C, Shan G, Song H, et al. Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study. Elife. 2023;12:e83662.
  13. Fitz VW, Kanakasabapathy MK, Thirumalaraju P, Kandula H, Ramirez LB, Boehnlein L, et al. Should there be an “AI” in TEAM? embryologists selection of high implantation potential embryos improves with the aid of an artificial intelligence algorithm. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(10):2663-70.
  14. Liu H, Li D, Dai C, Shan G, Zhang Z, Zhuang S, et al. Automated morphological grading of human blastocysts from multi-focus images. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2024;21(3):2584-92.
  15. Wang G, Wang K, Gao Y, Chen L, Gao T, Ma Y, et al. A generalized AI system for human embryo selection covering the entire IVF cycle via multi-modal contrastive learning. Patterns (N Y). 2024;5(7):100985.
  16. Hardarson T, Bungum M, Conaghan J, Meintjes M, Chantilis SJ, Molnar L, et al. Noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial comparing embryo development using media developed for sequential or undisturbed culture in a time-lapse setup. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1452-9.e1-4.
  17. AlSaad R, Abusarhan L, Odeh N, Abd-Alrazaq A, Choucair F, Zegour R, et al. Deep learning applications for human embryo assessment using time-lapse imaging: scoping review. Front Reprod Health. 2025;7:1549642.
  18. Cimadomo D, Chiappetta V, Innocenti F, Saturno G, Taggi M, Marconetto A, et al. Towards automation in IVF: pre-clinical validation of a deep learning-based embryo grading system during PGT-A cycles. J Clin Med. 2023;12(5):1806.
  19. Guo YH, Liu Y, Qi L, Song WY, Jin HX. Can time-lapse incubation and monitoring be beneficial to assisted reproduction technology outcomes? a randomized controlled trial using day 3 double embryo transfer. Front Physiol. 2022;12:794601.
  20. Fauser BCJM, Nicholas D, Ahuja K. Chief Editor's 2021 annual report. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44(5):765-7.
  21. Stimpfel M, Bacer-Kermavner L, Jancar N, Vrtacnik-Bokal E. The influence of the type of embryo culture media on the outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(6):848-54.
  22. Dieamant F, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Comar V, Mattila M, Vagnini LD, et al. Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(3):240-6.
  23. Braga D, Setti A, Morishima C, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Understanding the implications of follicular output rate (FORT) and follicle to oocyte index (FOI) on human embryo morphokinetics. J IVF Worldwide. 2024;2(1):1-11.
  24. Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Delgado A, Minasi MG, Fabozzi G, Del Gallego R, et al. Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are predictors of a live birth after euploid blastocyst transfer: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1080-93.e1.
  25. Salih M, Austin C, Warty R, Tiktin C, Rolnik D, Momeni M, et al. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(3):hoad031.
  26. Liao Q, Zhang Q, Feng X, Huang H, Xu H, Tian B, et al. Development of deep learning algorithms for predicting blastocyst formation and quality by time-lapse monitoring. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):415.
  27. Bormann CL, Kanakasabapathy MK, Thirumalaraju P, Gupta R, Pooniwala R, Kandula H, et al. Performance of a deep learning based neural network in the selection of human blastocysts for implantation. Elife. 2020;9:e55301.
  28. Theilgaard Lassen J, Fly Kragh M, Rimestad J, Nygård Johansen M, Berntsen J. Development and validation of deep learning based embryo selection across multiple days of transfer. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):4235.
  29. Zou H, Wang R, Morbeck DE. Diagnostic or prognostic? decoding the role of embryo selection on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(5):730-6.
Journal of Reproduction & Infertility
Volume 27, Issue 1
Winter 2026
Pages 10-19