Yaman C., Ebner T., Sommergruber M., Polz W., Tews G. Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic meas-urement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program: a prelimi-nary study.Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):797-801
Schild R.L., Indefrei D., Eschweiler S., Van der Ven H., Fimmers R., Hansmann M. Three-dimensional endometrial volume calculation and pregnancy rate in an in-vitro fertilization programme.Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(5):1255-8
Yuval Y., Lipitz S., Dor J., Achiron R. The relation-ships between endometrial thickness, and blood flow and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(4):1067-71
Bohrer M.K., Hock D.L., Rhoads G.G., Kemmann E. Sonographic assessment of endometrial pattern and thickness in patients treated with human menopausal gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(2):244-7
Kovacs P., Matyas S., Boda K., Kaali S.G. The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11):2337-41
Coulam C.B., Bustillo M., Soenksen D.M., Britten S. Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assis-ted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(5):1004-10
Bassil S.Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(3):258-63
Dickey R.P., Olar T.T., Taylor S.N., Curole D.N., Matulich E.M. Relationship of endometrial thickness and pattern to fecundity in ovulation induction cycles: effect of clomiphene citrate alone and with human menopausal gonadotropin. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(4):756 -60
Dickey R.P., Olar T.T., Curole D.N., Taylor S.N., Rye P.H. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after Assisted Reproduction Tech-nologies. Hum Reprod. 1992;7(3):418-21
Vera J.A., Arguello B., Crisosto C.A. Predictive value of endometrial pattern and thickness in the result of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Rev Chil ObstetGinecol. 1995;60(3):195-8
Yaman C., Ebner T., Jesacher K., Sommergruber M., Radner G., Tews G. Sonographic measurement of endometrium thickness as a predictive value for preg-nancy through IVF. Ultraschall Med. 2002;23(4):256-9
Fanchin R., Righini C., Ayoubi J.M., Olivennes F., de Ziegler D., Frydman R. New look at endometrial echo-genicity: objective computer-assisted measurements predict endometrial receptivity in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(2):274-81
Leibovitz Z., Grinin V., Rabia R., Degani S., Shapiro I., Tal J., Eibschitz I., Harari O., Paltieli Y., Aharoni A., Zeevi J., Ohel G. Assessment of endometrial recap-tivity for gestation in patients undergoing in vitro ferti-lization, using endometrial thickness and the endomet-rium-myometrium relative echogenicity coefficient. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14(3):194-9
Oliveira J.B., Baruffi R.L., Mauri A.L., Petersen C. G., Borges M.C., Franco J.G. Jr. Endometrial ultra-sonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme after ovarian stimulation and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and gonadotrophins. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2515-8
Ueno J., Oehninger S., Brzyski R.G., Acosta A.A., Philput C.B., Muasher S.J. Ultrasonographic appea-rance of the endometrium in natural and stimulated in-vitro fertilization cycles and its correlation with out-come. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(7):901-4
Damon V.B., Bessai K., Gregor J. Using ultrasound imaging in implantation. Zentralbl Gynakol.2001;123 (6):340-3
Turnbull L.W., Lesny P., Killick S.R. Assessment of uterine receptivity prior to embryo transfer: a review of currently available imaging modalities. Hum Reprod Update. 1995;1(5):505-14
Khalifa E., Brzyski R.G., Oehninger S., Acosta A.A., Muasher S.J. Sonographic appearance of the endomet-rium: the predictive value for the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod. 1992;7 (5):677-80
Oliveira J.B., Baruffi R.L., Mauri A.L., Petersen C. G., Campos M.S., Franco J.G. Jr. Endometrial ultraso-nography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fer-tilization programme. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(8):1312-5
Weissman A., Gotlieb L., Casper R.F. The detri-mental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(1): 147-9
Zaidi J., Campbell S., Pittrof R., Tan S.L. Endomet-rial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in-vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6(3):191-8
Madgar I., Hourvitz A., Levron J., Seidman D.S., Shulman A., Raviv G.G., et al. Outcome of invitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic injection of epidi-dymal and testicular sperm extracted from patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(6):1080-4
Kruger T.F., du Toit T.C., Franken D.R., Menkveld R., Lombard C.J. Sperm morphology: assessing the agreement between the manual method (strict criteria) and the sperm morphology analyzer IVOS. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(1):134-41
Rashidi B.H., Sadeghi M., Jafarabadi M., Tehrani Nejad E.S. Relationships between pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and endometrial thickness and pattern. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;120(2):179-84
Check J.H., Nowroozi K., Choe J., Lurie D., Diette-rich C. The effect of endometrial thickness and echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor oocyte-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(1): 72-5
Idriss W.K., Mohiuddin M.A., Zachariah M., Samba-sivarao K. Prognostic significance of endometrial evaluation by ultrasonography in ovulation induced cycles. Saudi Med J. 2000;21(11):1059-64
Dietterich C., Check J.H., Choe J.K., Nazari A., Lurie D. Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(4):781-6
Zhang X., Chen C.H., Confino E., Barnes R., Milad M., Kazer R.R. Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(2):336-40(yes)
Nawroth F., Foth D. Endometrial thickness and preg-nancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(6):1719-20
Soares S.R., Troncoso C., Bosch E., Serra V., Simon C., Remohi J., Pellicer A. Age and uterine recepti-veness: predicting the outcome of oocyte donation cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(7):4399-404
Jarvela I.Y., Sladkevicius P., Kelly S., Ojha K., Campbell S., Nargund G. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity during In-vitro fertilization using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(7):765-9
Yoeli R., Ashkenazi J., Orvieto R., Shelef M., Kaplan B., Bar-Hava I. Significance of increased endometrial thickness in assisted reproduction technology treat-ments. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004; 21(8):285-9
Kupesic S., Bekavac I., Bjelos D., Kurjak A. Assess-ment of endometrial receptivity by transvaginal color Doppler and three-dimensional power Doppler ultra-sonography in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(2):125-34
Sharara F.I., Lim J., McClamrock H.D. Endometrial pattern on the day of oocyte retrieval is more predictive of implantation success than the pattern or thickness on the day of hCG administration. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16(10):523-8
Rinaldi L., Lisi F., Floccari A., Lisi R., Pepe G., Fishel S. Endometrial thickness as a predictor of preg-nancy after in-vitro fertilization but not after intracyto-plasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(7): 1538-41
